Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library |
Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira Church and communist state IntraText CT - Text |
|
|
5. Facing the Problem
At first glance, and considered in itself, the problem of coexistence between the Church and a "tolerant" Communist regime might be stated as follows: If, in a given country living under a Communist government and regime, the holders of power, far from forbidding worship and preaching, permitted one and the other, could the Church accept this liberty of action in order to distribute the sacraments and the bread of the word of God unfettered? When the question is presented purely and simply in these terms, the answer is necessarily affirmative: The Church could, and even would be obliged to accept that freedom. In this sense She could, and would be obliged to coexist with Communism. For, under no pretext whatsoever may She refuse to carry out her mission. We must note, however, that this formulation of the problem is oversimplified. it makes one suppose implicitly that the Communist government would not impose the least restriction on the liberty of the Church in carrying out her doctrinal mission. But there is no reason to believe that such a government would give the Church full freedom to teach her doctrine, since this would imply allowing her to preach all the doctrines of the Popes concerning morals, the law, and particularly concerning the family and private property, which in turn would result in making every Catholic a born enemy of the regime, so that to the degree the Church extended her action She would be killing the regime. This means that the regime would be practicing suicide to the extent that it tolerated the freedom of the Church. And this would be so, above all, in countries where the influence of the Church over the population is very great. Thus, we cannot be satisfied with the resolution of the problem as it is presented in the general formulation above. We must see what solution should be given to this problem in the case of a Communist government which required that Catholic preaching and teaching, in order to be tolerated, conform to the following conditions: 1st ‑ that they convey the Church's doctrine in an affirmative manner, but without making to the faithful any refutations of materialism and other errors inherent to Marxist philosophy; 2nd ‑ that they remain silent as to the Church's thought concerning private property and the family; 3rd ‑or that, without criticizing directly the social and economic system of Marxism, they at least state that the legal existence of the family and private property is an ideal desirable in theory but unattainable in practice as a result of communist domination, and for this reason they recommend in the present situation that the faithful give up any attempt to abolish the Communist regime and to reestablish legally private property and the family in accordance with the principles of the Natural Law. Could such conditions be accepted, in all conscience, tacitly or expressly, as a price for a minimum of legal freedom for the Church under a Cominunist regime? In other words, could the Church renounce her liberty in some of these points in order to preserve it in others for the spiritual benefit of the faithful? This is the heart of the problem.
|
Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library |
Best viewed with any browser at 800x600 or 768x1024 on Tablet PC IntraText® (V89) - Some rights reserved by EuloTech SRL - 1996-2007. Content in this page is licensed under a Creative Commons License |