Text

 1 Text|          illness as an "angel of satan". However, since the fall
 2 Text|           the words "angel" and "satan" reveal more than just an
 3 Text|        by the names "angel" and "satan".~It is both the depth of
 4 Text|          as to whether the word "satan" should be understood in
 5 Text|         the two words (angel and satan) are equally interdefinitive.
 6 Text|      instrument or operation "of satan". It seems that most interpreters
 7 Text|    authentic.~If we accept that "satan" is in the nominative case -
 8 Text|         angel" is equivalent to "satan" or to put it more correctly,
 9 Text|        to put it more correctly, Satan "becomes", under certain
10 Text|       among angels, could become Satan, as well as how Satan on
11 Text|     become Satan, as well as how Satan on certain occasions can
12 Text|       other hand we accept that 'satan' is in the genitive case,
13 Text|    angelic messenger directed by Satan, then of course the whole
14 Text|     heresy. Therefore, the term 'satan' must be interpreted in
15 Text| unspecified illness an "angel of satan".~It is beyond doubt that
16 Text|         his life was the work of Satan. However, even though the
17 Text|        illness tormented him as "satan", it is characteristic that