Part, Chapter, §

 1  Theses          |     substance and the unity of the~person follows the communication
 2  Theses          |          with divinity in the same person in an ineffable way [ineffabilibus~
 3  Theses          |         body do not constitute one person, as God~and man constitute
 4  Theses          |         God~and man constitute one person.~[ETML:S:paragrafo]39. And
 5    Disp, Pre     |           these two natures in one person, so that they are joined
 6    Disp, Pre     |           he is God and man in one person. The natures are joined~
 7    Disp, Pre     |     personally in the unity of the person. There are not two sons,
 8    Disp, Pre     |         well, because they are one person." If these~[articles] are
 9    Disp, Pre     |            should be united~in one person. Therefore, so that we may
10    Disp, Pre     |       Christ is God~and man in one person, and there are not two persons,
11    Disp, Pre     |          natures are~united in one person, so that what is done by
12   Disp2,   I     |             I.~ ~Argument: A human person is one thing, a divine person
13   Disp2,   I     |      person is one thing, a divine person another. But in~Christ there
14   Disp2,   I     |            divinity constitute one person. But these two natures are~
15   Disp2,   I     |          respect to [secundum] the person. For then they are undivided~[
16   Disp2,   I     |          belonging to an undivided~person [indistinctae personae].
17   Disp2,   I     |          natures, but an undivided person.~ ~
18   Disp2,  II     |       union, that is, there is one person, not two~persons. But that
19   Disp2,  II     |          not two~persons. But that person is God and man, one and
20   Disp2,  II     |          and man, one and the same person, who was~before the creation
21   Disp2,  II     | nonetheless he is one and the same person; and so too here in Christ
22   Disp2,  II     |          and~man are joined in one person and must not be distinguished.
23   Disp2,  II     |           God and man are made one person, and the same things are
24   Disp2,  II     |         but they are united in one person. That is to say,~Christ,
25   Disp2, III     |          two natures united in one person, it is~attributed to both
26   Disp2,  IV     |          Argument: A word is not a person. Christ is the Word. Therefore
27   Disp2,  IV     |          Therefore Christ is~not a person.~ ~ I prove the major premise,
28   Disp2,  IV     |         premise, that a word and a person are different.~ ~Response:
29   Disp2,  IV     |        signifies a substance and a person, because the divine~Word
30   Disp2,  IV     |             that is, a substantial person [ipsa substantia et persona]. ~
31   Disp2,   V     |        because of the unity of the~person, this being crucified is
32   Disp2,  IX     |         the divinity united in one person. Therefore he says, "Do
33   Disp2,   X     |            man who is~not a divine Person [personaliter Deus], as
34   Disp2,   X     |             because he is a divine Person, and in conception the~flesh
35   Disp2,  XI     |    divinity. The humanity is not a person, but a nature.~ ~
36   Disp2, XII     |            and concrete terms to a person.~ ~
37   Disp2,  XV     |           Christ are united~in one person. When therefore it is said
38   Disp2,  XV     |          is~not true, for only one person of the divinity, the Son,
39   Disp2,  XV     |      nature, when it is take for a person, was~born, suffered, died,
40   Disp2,  XV     |        whole~Trinity, but only one person of the Trinity. Therefore
41   Disp2, XVII    |          of the two natures in one~person is the greatest possible,
42   Disp2, XVII    |            their properties to the person, as if he were solely God
43   Disp2, XXIV    |           soul and flesh, thus the person of Christ consists~of two
44   Disp2, XXV     |         Because "man" includes the person, and "humanity" does not.~ ~
45   Disp2, XXV     |            nature, because he is a~person, but humanity does not signify
46   Disp2, XXV     |        humanity does not signify a person. Therefore [these terms]~
47   Disp2, XXV     |          were said that the divine person~assumed a man, that is,
48   Disp2, XXV     |            a man, that is, a human person, it would follow that there
49   Disp2, XXV     |        personal name, now that the person has assumed the person.~ ~
50   Disp2, XXV     |         the person has assumed the person.~ ~
51   Disp2, XXVII   |     theology it does not signify a person, as "man"~signifies a person,
52   Disp2, XXVII   |       person, as "man"~signifies a person, that is, a particular person, [
53   Disp2, XXVII   |      person, that is, a particular person, [if we were to say] that~
54   Disp2, XXVII   |          were said that the divine person assumed~a human nature,
55   Disp2, XXVII   |           human nature, that is, a person, then there would be two
56   Disp2, XXVII   |           assumed,~but an existing person. Therefore "man" has a different
57   Disp2, XXVII   |           man, that is, the divine person which assumed~human nature,
58   Disp2, XXVII   |      assumed~human nature, for the person did not assume a person.
59   Disp2, XXVII   |            person did not assume a person. In philosophy there is~
60   Disp2, XXVII   |             signifies a subsistent person.~ ~
61   Disp2, XXVIII  |           we understand the divine person which assumed~human nature.
62   Disp2, XXXI    |            the two natures are one person.~ ~
63   Disp2, XXXII   |       creature in the unity of the person. ~The worthless Schwenkfeld [
64   Disp2, XXXIII  |            divide the unity of the person, but we will [not]~concede.
65   Disp2, XXXIII  |            distinct natures in one person.~ ~