Chap.,  §

 1 Intro,    1  |      progressivists, socialists, and communists, such as pacifism, coexistence,
 2 Intro,    1  |        succeeded in transforming non‑communists into communists.~As observations
 3 Intro,    1  |     transforming non‑communists into communists.~As observations revealed
 4 Intro,    3  |            idiots," if not convinced communists. For this very reason, the
 5 Intro,    3  |            little by little becoming communists. If at a certain moment
 6 Intro,    4  |              to make innumerable non‑communists inadvertently evolve towards
 7   1          |          most recent strategy of the communists to conquer the world.~ ~
 8   1,    2    |    persuasion is not regarded by the communists as something collateral,
 9   1,    2    |        violent assault. In fact, the communists now expect greater results
10   1,    4    |           wants to turn all men into communists and shape the life of all
11   1,    5    | Unresponsiveness of the Masses~ ~The communists have been preaching social
12   1,    5    |            Nearly all this time, the communists have had virtually complete
13   1,    5    |             chronic inability of the communists to win through the ballot
14   1,    5    |              All this shows that the communists would by no means have achieved
15   1,    5    |           respect is admitted by the communists themselves. Kruschevites
16   1,    5    |      enterprise. In other words, the communists hope to improve productivity
17   1,    6    |        nuclear conflict bring to the communists themselves? Though perhaps
18   2,    2    |        accomplices of communism. The communists try to gather the "useful
19   2,    2    |         without reservation.~ ~· The communists find it necessary to attack
20   2,    2    |          they are suspected of being communists, the more efficient they
21   2,    5    |        sympathy and cooperation with communists, finally leading to the
22   2,    7    |              State control. However, communists don't see it this way. For
23   2,    7    |           engender inequalities. For communists, the incompatibility between
24   3,    2    |        inertia of Christians. If the communists brutally present us with
25   4      (16)|    hypothesis of a dialogue with the communists, which it classifies as "
26   4,    3    |        differently, even if they are communists. By the affability that
27 End,    4    |          irenistic dialogue with the communists "Pax" reveals itself to
28 End,    7    |             a socialist economy, the communists on their part will be ready
29 End,    7    |            between the Catholics and communists on the Peninsula.~In opposition
30 End,    7    |           like Italy.~But, since the communists place hopes in it in Italy'