Chap.,  §

 1   2,    5    |      words has an intrinsically bad meaning. However, they can
 2   4      (16)|         the censures we make of bad dialogue differentiate it
 3   4,    1    |         the heat of his good or bad passions.~So, argument pure
 4   4,    1    |  therefore have ‑ when they are bad ‑ all the exacerbations
 5   4      (20)|       rejection of apologetics. Bad apologetics is a kind of
 6   4      (20)|        a kind of counterpart to bad argument and bad polemic.
 7   4      (20)| counterpart to bad argument and bad polemic. Bad apologetics
 8   4      (20)|       argument and bad polemic. Bad apologetics is apriorism,
 9   4      (20)|   simple and polemics.~In turn, bad hagiography is the transposition
10   4      (20)|         is the transposition of bad apologetics to the field
11 End,    4    |       relativism. These are the bad, the hard‑hearted, and the
12 End,    4    |    perspicacity to see that the bad will not have the delights
13 End      (26)|  actions and punished for their bad actions here on earth.~Thus,