bold = Main text
   Chapter, §                             grey = Comment text

 1   1, 3 |    not be right to review the moral norms in force till now,
 2   1    |              Interpreting the Moral Law~
 3   1, 4 |      on the principles of the moral teaching on marriage—a teaching
 4   1, 4 |      to interpret the natural moral law. It is in fact indisputable,
 5   1, 4 |     interpreters of the whole moral law, not only, that is,
 6   1, 6 |      agreement concerning the moral norms to be proposed, and
 7   1, 6 |     were at variance with the moral doctrine on marriage constantly
 8   2, 10|       and with due respect to moral precepts, decide not to
 9   2, 10|     It concerns the objective moral order which was established
10   2, 13|     and therefore offends the moral order in its particular
11   2, 14| qualified by exactly the same moral goodness as these. Though
12   2, 14|   lawful to tolerate a lesser moral evil in order to avoid a
13   2, 14|   very nature contradicts the moral order, and which must therefore
14   2, 16|     the Church concerning the moral laws governing marriage,
15   2, 16|       in the least offend the moral principles which We have
16   2, 17|     and a general lowering of moral standards. Not much experience
17   2, 17|   need incentives to keep the moral law, and it is an evil thing
18   2, 17|       for the precepts of the moral law. Who will blame a government
19   2, 18|  humbly but firmly the entire moral law, both natural and evangelical. ~
20   2, 18|   preserving intact the whole moral law of marriage, the Church
21   3, 22|  license and the norms of the moral law may be fully safeguarded. ~
22   3, 22|   passions and encourages low moral standards, as well as every
23   3, 23|     people wisely so that the moral law and the freedom of the
24   3, 28|   especially to you who teach moral theology—to spell out clearly
25   3, 28|     utmost importance that in moral as well as in dogmatic theology