Unlawful
Birth Control Methods
14. Therefore We base Our
words on the first principles of a human and Christian doctrine of marriage
when We are obliged once more to declare that the direct interruption of the
generative process already begun and, above all, all direct abortion, even for
therapeutic reasons, are to be absolutely excluded as lawful means of
regulating the number of children. 14 Equally to be condemned, as the
magisterium of the Church has affirmed on many occasions, is direct
sterilization, whether of the man or of the woman, whether permanent or
temporary. 15
Similarly excluded is any action which
either before, at the moment of, or after sexual intercourse, is specifically
intended to prevent procreation—whether as an end or as a means. 16
Neither is it valid to argue, as a
justification for sexual intercourse which is deliberately contraceptive, that
a lesser evil is to be preferred to a greater one, or that such intercourse
would merge with procreative acts of past and future to form a single entity,
and so be qualified by exactly the same moral goodness as these. Though it is
true that sometimes it is lawful to tolerate a lesser moral evil in order to
avoid a greater evil or in order to promote a greater good," it is never
lawful, even for the gravest reasons, to do evil that good may come of it
18—in other words, to intend directly something which of its very
nature contradicts the moral order, and which must therefore be judged unworthy
of man, even though the intention is to protect or promote the welfare of an
individual, of a family or of society in general. Consequently, it is a serious
error to think that a whole married life of otherwise normal relations can
justify sexual intercourse which is deliberately contraceptive and so
intrinsically wrong.
|