Chap., §

 1    1,  14     |               for both philosophy and theology: Saint Anselm. In his Proslogion,
 2    1,  15     |               theme of philosophy and theology alike. For all their difference
 3    4,  39     |               early form of Christian theology. The name “theology” itself,
 4    4,  39     |         Christian theology. The name “theology” itself, together with the
 5    4,  39     |             together with the idea of theology as rational discourse about
 6    4,  39     |              thought, once adopted by theology, underwent profound changes,
 7    4,  40     |           synthesis of philosophy and theology, embracing currents of thought
 8    4,  42     |                     42. In Scholastic theology, the role of philosophically
 9    4,  43     |          model of the right way to do theology. In this connection, I would
10    4,  44     |              of divine realities. His theology allows us to understand
11    4,  45     |               the first universities, theology came more directly into
12    4,  45     |              the organic link between theology and philosophy, Saint Albert
13    5,  49     |            that, even when it engages theology, philosophy must remain
14    5,  54(71) |               Certain Aspects of the “Theology of Liberation” Libertatis
15    5,  55     |         knowing or its structures.~In theology too the temptations of other
16    5,  55     |               accorded to speculative theology, and in disdain for the
17    5,  63     |         creative relationship between theology and philosophy. In the light
18    5,  63     |            clarity what link, if any, theology should forge with the different
19    6          |    INTERACTION BETWEEN PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY~
20    6,  64     |           word in the light of faith, theology for its part must relate,
21    6,  64     |         recall some specific tasks of theology which, by the very nature
22    6,  65     |                                   65. Theology is structured as an understanding
23    6,  65     |    intellectus fidei. With the first, theology makes its own the content
24    6,  65     |       Magisterium.88 With the second, theology seeks to respond through
25    6,  65     |           contributes specifically to theology in preparing for a correct
26    6,  65     |               of the great masters of theology, who often adopt concepts
27    6,  66     |                For its part, dogmatic theology must be able to articulate
28    6,  66     |             different themes of moral theology, which employ concepts such
29    6,  66     |        argument. Speculative dogmatic theology thus presupposes and implies
30    6,  67     |            the concern of fundamental theology will be to justify and expound
31    6,  67     |             act of faith, fundamental theology should show how, in the
32    6,  67     |                Similarly, fundamental theology should demonstrate the profound
33    6,  67(90) |               preamble to fundamental theology, so that today too, faith
34    6,  67(90) |               Congress of Fundamental Theology on the 125th Anniversary
35    6,  68     |                             68. Moral theology has perhaps an even greater
36    6,  68     |         reason. In other words, moral theology requires a sound philosophical
37    6,  69     |               and culture, claim that theology should look more to the
38    6,  69     |               which can be of help to theology.~
39    6,  70     |               for both philosophy and theology, the question of the relationship
40    6,  73     |              the relationship between theology and philosophy is best construed
41    6,  73     |           best construed as a circle. Theology's source and starting-point
42    6,  77     |              stance worth noting when theology itself calls upon it. Theology
43    6,  77     |        theology itself calls upon it. Theology in fact has always needed
44    6,  77     |         reason in the light of faith, theology presupposes and requires
45    6,  77     |               and argument. Moreover, theology needs philosophy as a partner
46    6,  77     |               remains unimpaired when theology calls upon it; but it shows
47    6,  77     |        functional role with regard to theology. Rather, it was used in
48    6,  77     |               for their part, to shun theology completely, they would be
49    6,  77     |              stance, philosophy, like theology, comes more directly under
50    6,  77     |           respect whenever it engages theology.~
51    6,  79     |            certain requirements which theology—and more fundamentally still,
52    7,  82     |             explain these statements, theology needs therefore the contribution
53    7,  83     |            not be revealed, nor could theology render it in some way intelligible, 102
54    7,  83     |               theological research. A theology without a metaphysical horizon
55    7,  85     |             is all the more valid for theology. Not only because theology
56    7,  85     |            theology. Not only because theology has the living Tradition
57    7,  86     |            and argumentation, even in theology, tend to use individual
58    7,  87     |             demands of truth to which theology is called to respond.~
59    7          |                     Current tasks for theology~
60    7,  92     |          understanding of Revelation, theology has always had to respond
61    7,  92     |   conceptually clear way. Today, too, theology faces a dual task. On the
62    7,  92     |                    On the other hand, theology must look to the ultimate
63    7,  92     |                   This task, which is theology's prime concern, challenges
64    7,  92     |          authority which holds out to theology and philosophy alike the
65    7,  92     |            given the current tasks of theology.~
66    7,  93     |              93. The chief purpose of theology is to provide an understanding
67    7,  93     |               the prime commitment of theology is seen to be the understanding
68    7,  97     |           sources is a vital task for theology; but another still more
69    7,  97     |             all would enable dogmatic theology to perform its functions
70    7,  97     |          things to fulfilment. 115 In theology, which draws its principles
71    7,  98     | considerations apply equally to moral theology. It is no less urgent that
72    7,  98     |           this truth demands of moral theology a careful enquiry rooted
73    7,  98     |             fulfil its mission, moral theology must turn to a philosophical
74    7,  98     |           supernatural virtues, moral theology will be able to tackle the
75    7,  99     |               see why, in addition to theology, reference to catechesis
76 Conc, 100     |          always obvious, influence on theology and its disciplines. For
77 Conc, 101     |      encounter between philosophy and theology and the exchange of their
78 Conc, 101     |              as the science of faith, theology has certainly challenged
79 Conc, 101     |             just as I have reaffirmed theology's duty to recover its true
80 Conc, 101     |         recover its relationship with theology. In theology, philosophy
81 Conc, 101     |        relationship with theology. In theology, philosophy will find not
82 Conc, 101     |               For by its very nature, theology is sustained in the search
83 Conc, 101(123)|                    Nobody can make of theology as it were a simple collection
84 Conc, 103     |          responds to the challenge of theology's demands and evolves in
85 Conc, 105     |             breadth of the science of theology. I wish to thank them for
86 Conc, 108     |               critical resources that theology, as the understanding of