Chap., §

 1  Int,   6|      openly” (2 Cor 4:2), as also theologians and philosophers whose duty
 2    5,  54|         proposed and developed by theologians, but had their origins “
 3    5,  54|    examined critically: “Catholic theologians and philosophers, whose
 4    5,  54|       adoption by some liberation theologians of opinions and methods
 5    5,  55|         happens particularly when theologians, through lack of philosophical
 6    5,  58|         most influential Catholic theologians of the present century,
 7    5,  61| philosophy is shared by not a few theologians.~There are various reasons
 8    5,  61|           invitation addressed to theologians to engage the human sciences
 9    6,  64|          I have no wish to direct theologians to particular methods, since
10    6,  74|     experience of great Christian theologians who also distinguished themselves
11    6,  76|      philosophers have not become theologians, since they have not sought
12    6,  77|           Church and the Medieval theologians adopted non-Christian philosophies.
13    6,  77|         of their separation.~Were theologians to refuse the help of philosophy,
14    6,  79|           be hoped therefore that theologians and philosophers will let
15    7,  86| philosophical terms to which some theologians are given at times. Such
16    7,  87|  understandable to our time, some theologians use only the most recent
17    7,  92|          stop short of that goal. Theologians should remember that their
18 Conc, 105|     thoughts turn particularly to theologians, encouraging them to pay
19 Conc, 105|           word of God or not. Let theologians always remember the words