Chap., §

 1    5,  51     |  weakened by sin. This is why no historical form of philosophy can legitimately
 2    5,  51     |         of reason's inherent and historical limitations, it is difficult
 3    5,  58     |    writers received new impetus. Historical studies flourished, resulting
 4    5,  58     |         schools. With the use of historical method, knowledge of the
 5    6,  77     | non-Christian philosophies. This historical fact confirms the value
 6    7,  83     |  specific school or a particular historical current of thought. I want
 7    7,  86     |         within a system or their historical context. They therefore
 8    7,  87     |         set it within its proper historical and cultural context. The
 9    7,  87     |     certain period and a certain historical purpose. At least implicitly,
10    7,  91     |     demarcation of the different historical periods. One thing however
11    7,  92     |          to respond in different historical moments to the demands of
12    7,  94     |          the narration of simple historical events or the statement
13    7,  94     |         claim. 111 Beyond simple historical occurrence, the truth of
14    7,  94(111)|   Commission, Instruction on the Historical Truth of the Gospels (21
15    7,  95     |       truth with the unavoidable historical and cultural conditioning
16    7,  95     |        possible to move from the historical and contingent circumstances
17 Conc, 104     |       and the key issues of this historical moment. Reflecting in the