Chap., §

1    2,  19|         author affirms that, in reasoning about nature, the human
2    2,  20|      overvalued. The results of reasoning may in fact be true, but
3    2,  22|       became “empty”, and human reasoning became distorted and inclined
4    3,  31|      life or by dint of further reasoning. Nonetheless, there are
5    3,  34|    fundamental premise of human reasoning, as the principle of non-contradiction
6    4,  42|         satisfied if, by way of reasoning, he reaches a quite certain
7    4,  42| established on the basis of due reasoning, then the foundation of
8    4,  48|        that faith, tied to weak reasoning, might be more penetrating;
9    7,  97|  between faith and metaphysical reasoning.~