Chap., §
1 1, 1| influence the world of work and production no less than the industrial
2 1, 1| automation into many spheres of production, the increase in the cost
3 2, 5| indispensable factor of production. Industry in its turn will
4 2, 7| tools and means that make production possible. This way of looking
5 2, 7| and the tools and means of production has given rise to the development
6 2, 7| impersonal "force" needed for production (the expression "workforce"
7 2, 7| treated as an instrument of production12, whereas he - he alone,
8 2, 7| first and foremost of the production structure that work is -
9 2, 7| of the material means of production, as an instrument and not
10 2, 7| of the whole process of production.~This explains why the analysis
11 2, 8| solely an instrument of production, and that capital is the
12 2, 8| efficient factor and purpose of production.~From that time, worker
13 3, 11| holders of the means of production, and the broader multitude
14 3, 11| shared in the process of production solely by their labour.
15 3, 11| collectivization of the means of production so that,through the transfer
16 3, 11| ownership of the means of production. According to the principal
17 3, 12| concerns the process of production: in this process labour
18 3, 12| whole collection of means of production, remains a mere instrument
19 3, 12| whole process of economic production, whether labour or the whole
20 3, 12| whole collection of means of production and the technology connected
21 3, 12| labour. All the means of production, from the most primitive
22 3, 12| whole collection of means of production that in a sense are considered
23 3, 12| instruments, the means of production, he must first assimilate
24 3, 12| efficiently in the modern production process - demands greater
25 3, 12| human being sharing in the production process, even if he or she
26 3, 12| efficient subject in this production process, while the whole
27 3, 12| the primacy of man in the production process, the primacy of
28 3, 13| participation in the whole production process, independently of
29 3, 13| from the structure of the production process or from the structure
30 3, 13| say of everything in the production process which constitutes
31 3, 13| two impersonal forces, two production factors juxtaposed in the
32 3, 13| up in opposition as two production factors viewed in the above
33 3, 13| the efficient cause of the production process, but continues to
34 3, 13| resultant" of the economic or production relations prevailing at
35 3, 13| whole collection of means of production. ~
36 3, 14| forces" operating in economic production. Behind both concepts there
37 3, 14| the owners of the means of production, and on the other side those
38 3, 14| question of the means of production. The Encyclical Mater et
39 3, 14| ownership of the means of production. Isolating these means as
40 3, 14| conditions, of certain means of production. In the course of the decades
41 3, 14| ownership of the means of production as an untouchable "dogma"
42 3, 14| the whole of the means of production, is at the same time the
43 3, 14| help of all these means of production, and these means can be
44 3, 14| labour and the worker in the production process demands various
45 3, 14| ownership of the means of production. This is so not only in
46 3, 14| ownership of the means of production. For it must be noted that
47 3, 14| merely taking these means of production (capital) out of the hands
48 3, 14| disposal of the means of production and not refraining even
49 3, 14| converting the means of production into State property in the
50 3, 15| ownership of the means of production and also in the system in
51 3, 15| with regard to the means of production that has weighed upon human
52 3, 15| using all the means of production, he also wishes the fruit
53 3, 15| wishes that, within the production process, provision be made
54 3, 15| reasons than one a mere production instrument rather than a
55 3, 15| economic system itself and the production process benefit precisely
56 3, 15| ownership of the means of production. While we accept that for
57 3, 15| socialization of the means of production must take this argument
58 4, 17| the means of industrial production (the companies referred
59 4, 17| ownership of the means of production). ~It is easy to see that
60 4, 19| ownership of the means of production or in a system where ownership
61 4, 20| the owners of the means of production. Their task is to defend
62 4, 20| who manage the means of production or who own them must in
63 4, 20| components of the process of production in any social system - it
64 4, 20| ownership of the means of production or in the way these are
|