Chap., §

 1 Int,  4  |           permanent validity of its precepts, is rejected; certain of
 2   1,  11 |           from which the particular precepts flow and towards which they
 3   1,  13 |        prohibitions. These negative precepts express with particular
 4   1,  17 |             man's "liberation" from precepts. On the contrary, the latter
 5   1,  20 |            words, his deeds and his precepts constitute the moral rule
 6   1,  24 |           in Christ.33 The external precepts also mentioned in the Gospel
 7   1,  26 |          Holy Spirit, of the Lord's precepts as they are to be lived
 8   1,  27 |           Word made flesh, puts his precepts and love into practice in
 9   2,  44 |         making wise the simple; the precepts of the Lord are right, rejoicing
10   2,  51 |              it is universal in its precepts and its authority extends
11   2,  52 |           as they deserve. Positive precepts such as these, which order
12   2,  52 | corresponding virtues. The negative precepts of the natural law are universally
13   2,  52 |             case — to violate these precepts. They oblige everyone, regardless
14   2,  67 |          case of the positive moral precepts, prudence always has the
15   2,  67 |              But the negative moral precepts, those prohibiting certain
16   2,  75 |            certain particular moral precepts. Even when grave matter
17   2,  75 |          matter is concerned, these precepts should be considered as
18   2,  76 |          validity of negative moral precepts, which oblige without exception,
19   2,  76 |          respect the specific moral precepts declared and taught by the
20   3,  84 |    unfavourably contrasted with the precepts of the moral law, nor is
21   3,  95 |           permanent validity of the precepts prohibiting intrinsically
22   3,  110|        faithful specific particular precepts and requires that they consider
23   3,  110|            obligatory nature of the precepts it proposes, demonstrating