Chap., §

 1    1,   1    |        frequently dealt with the question and has sometimes made the
 2    2,   9    |      commonly called the "social question."~In fact, the Encyclical
 3    2,   9    |          clarity that the social question has acquired a worldwide
 4    2,   9    |     Recognition that the "social question" has assumed a worldwide
 5    2,   9    |        declaring that the social question has acquired worldwide dimensions,
 6    2,   9    |       universality of the social question, but rather in the moral
 7    2,  10    |           In fact, if the social question has acquired a worldwide
 8    3,  13    |       Jesus himself who comes to question us (cf. Mt 25:31-46).~
 9    3,  14    |          which render the social question much more complex, precisely
10    3,  14    |           precisely because this question has assumed a universal
11    3,  18    |       should have, prompts us to question seriously the type of development
12    3,  19    |   developed countries. It is the question of the international debt,
13    3,  19(38)|        to the International Debt Question (December 27, 1986).~
14    3,  19    | Populorum Progressio39 - and the question of the development of peoples.~
15    3,  19(40)|        to the International Debt Question (December 27, 1986).~
16    3,  21    |          view of development the question naturally arises: in what
17    3,  24(42)|        to the International Debt Question (December 27, 986), III,
18    4,  30    |      although always called into question and threatened by sin, are
19    4,  33(62)|           ibid., n. 47: "It is a question, rather, of building a world
20    5,  37    |  development of peoples: it is a question of a moral evil, the fruit
21    5,  38    |   connotation.~It is above all a question of interdependence, sensed
22    6,  42    |       dimension which the social question has assumed,76 this love
23    6,  43    |    recognized as inadequate; the question of technological exchanges