Chapter

 1 17|             which He consecrated in memory of His blood. On this false
 2 24|             capable of a failure of memory; because he has conceded
 3 24|         susceptible of a failure in memory. This point I have discussed
 4 24|             therefore to no loss of memory; for this defect of oblivion
 5 24|          which you predicate it, as memory is the glory thereof, which
 6 24|          soul was capable of losing memory: the question rather is,
 7 24|            which ought to have lost memory, if it once incurred the
 8 24|        entrance into the body, does memory fail, as if thenceforth
 9 24|        Still exercise its powers of memory? And how comes it to pass
10 24|          insufficient to efface the memory of an age which endured
11 24|            suppose, be injurious to memory. One thing is certain, that
12 24|             the resurrection of the memory. Now, how should not that
13 24|             which is hostile to the memory at first, be also prejudicial
14 24|           earth, and here recall to memory their previous; existence,
15 45|            its own operations? This memory must be an especial gift
16 45|              That, therefore, which memory supplies betokens soundness
17 45| ecstatically experiences whilst the memory remains unchecked, is a
18 46|            or aimed at reviving the memory of them as the mere stage
19 56|       feelings of grief which their memory excited. But, after all,