bold = Main text
   Book, Chapter                                       grey = Comment text

 1      I, 3     |              contention lies in the point of number: whether two Gods
 2      I, 3     |             all are agreed on. this point (because nobody will deny
 3      I, 4     |            we arrive, then, on this point is this: either we must
 4      I, 11    |            things strange to Him? a point which will be more fully
 5      I, 11    |       function; namely, to teach or point out what is convenient and
 6      I, 17    |           liberation. And even this point also must have its own evidence,
 7      I, 17    | manifestation; we at present simply point it out.~
 8      I, 19    |          will not deny that in this point they have their very best
 9      I, 20    |      prevarication against God on a point of public doctrine. Touching
10      I, 21    |            too as a great and vital point. No doubt, after the time
11      I, 22    |            God's goodness. My first point, however, iS to discover
12      I, 25    |            is, furthermore, at this point quite open to discussion,
13     II, 1     |          have been directed to this point alone, that he is no god
14     II, 1     |       clearer would have seemed the point as to the honour in which
15     II, 3     |            their god. Now this very point, which is a material one
16     II, 4     |        benignant act of His thus to point out the issues of transgression,
17     II, 4     |         these things and up to this point; learn it from His excellent
18     II, 5     |           not linger long over this point for Christ's own definition
19     II, 6     |             be good just up to this point, if he should display his
20     II, 15    |          not linger too long on the point, (I would challenge you
21     II, 18    |      PURPOSES IN A SOCIAL AND MORAL POINT OF VIEW OF THIS, AND SUNDRY
22     II, 21    |            allow. It is more to the point, if you be confuted on plain
23     II, 24    |           or an evil deed. Now this point is determined for you even
24     II, 26    |           was swearing to this very point, that besides himself there
25     II, 27    |        dwell more at length on this point; although with heretics
26    III, 1intro|           is found of later date, a point which I have inserted in
27    III, 2     |          Coming then at once to the point, I have to encounter the
28    III, 2     |          His Father. For this was a point of order, that the Father
29    III, 4     |           to me to treat that other point: Why he came not after Christ?
30    III, 5     |            as I shall now from this point have to grapple with my
31    III, 6     |              by mutual consent, the point of discussion is not the
32    III, 8     |          the other god (for on this point also they had been branded
33    III, 11    |           hung the question on this point. Forsilly women fancy themselves
34    III, 12    |        while you contend that in no point does it suit. For, to begin
35    III, 13    |            should first examine the point of age, whether it can be
36    III, 24    |            us to dinner, but do not point out your house; you assert
37     IV, 2     |       prefer to join issue on every point; nor shall we leave unnoticed
38     IV, 3     |             course previous to that point, it must have had its own
39     IV, 4     |           Now what is to settle the point for us, except it be that
40     IV, 9     |             before anything else to point out to him the force of
41     IV, 10    |         discussion will turn on the point, of which human parent He
42     IV, 10    |           only, then you concede my point; if not through a human
43     IV, 10    |             not, following up their point about man, answer them,that
44     IV, 11    |             would there be a single point where it could be challenged.
45     IV, 12    |             this stand as a settled point, that discussion concerning
46     IV, 12    |           all occasions on this one point, that another Christ is
47     IV, 13    |              I might from this very point conclude of my Christ, that
48     IV, 14    |           Christ, it determines the point that that was the Son of
49     IV, 16    |             and gave it distinctive point, and arranged it after the
50     IV, 19    |             question raised on this point, which they must resolve
51     IV, 19    |             a method of testing the point had therefore no consistency
52     IV, 20    |          MOSAIC UNCLEANNESS ON THIS POINT EXPLAINED.~But "what manner
53     IV, 20    |              This indeed is not our point now; but the remark has
54     IV, 22    |            with the power of God, a point concerning which there is
55     IV, 24    |          law of the Creator on this point also presents us with a
56     IV, 27    |         their God, but concerning a point of His instruction to them,
57     IV, 27    |             and mint? For the whole point of the rebuke lay in this,
58     IV, 29    |         parity of relation in every point. We are servants because
59     IV, 35    |           been already said on this point in a former passage. Now,
60     IV, 36    |            Antithesis must lose its point by its own absurdity. Those
61     IV, 37    |            pans, body and soul, the point to be inquired into is,
62     IV, 38    |     pertinent it was to the case in point. Because the question concerned
63     IV, 38    |          must not turn on any other point than on the proposed question,
64     IV, 38    |             now purposely moots the point before them, and that of
65     IV, 39    |            connection suit in every point the Son of man, so that
66     IV, 43conc|  MANIPULATION OF THE GOSPEL ON THIS POINT.~It was very meet that the
67      V, 1intro|             my little work, to this point, I require to know of Marcion
68      V, 1intro|           believe? Take now from my point of view the apostle, in
69      V, 2     |      dispensation of the Creator, a point which we have already often
70      V, 2     |          the dispensation, the sole point of the question to be discussed
71      V, 2     |             Creator? Take away this point, and the controversy falls
72      V, 2     |           on the withdrawal of this point, that they must of course
73      V, 2     |        appointment of the Creator a point, which we shall still have
74      V, 3     |            to have believed (on the point)? For the rest, the apostle
75      V, 5     |          too, in every epistle. The point, then, is, that it is not (
76      V, 6     |            go back therefore to the point, and ask him this question:
77      V, 9     |             INTERPRETATIONS ON THIS POINT SIMILAR. JESUS NOT HEZEKIAH
78      V, 9     |       superfluous. Now in this very point, which is called the resurrection
79      V, 9     |      mortality in Adam. But at this point (the apostle) has made a
80      V, 10    |            one had an idea. On this point we have other opponents
81      V, 11    |             any greater length this point of ambiguous punctuation,
82      V, 13    |          censure of the Jews, as to point against them the denunciation
83      V, 17    |             in investigating such a point. But of what consequence
84      V, 18    |        shall now endeavour, from my point of view, to prove that the
85      V, 18    |       should I not insist upon this point here, that he ought to have