bold = Main text
   Book, Chapter                                    grey = Comment text

 1      I, 6 |          THEIR DIVINITY, DENIES THIS DIVERSITY.~Thus far our discussion
 2      I, 6 |             of the question, whether diversity (in the Godhead) can at
 3      I, 6 |          that he has no room for any diversity in his gods, because, having
 4      I, 6 |      divinity, you have denied their diversity.~
 5      I, 9 |             wherein there is found a diversity of condition, they shall
 6      I, 9 | determination, as being freed by the diversity of their essential condition
 7      I, 16|              affirm, then, that this diversity of things visible and invisible
 8      I, 16|              similarly tempered with diversity, both in his body and in
 9      I, 16|              In like manner there is diversity also in his sensation: now
10      I, 16|          imputed, marking as they do diversity in the Creator Himself,
11      I, 19|               in order that from the diversity of the two documents which
12      I, 19|               they may contend for a diversity of gods also. Since, therefore,
13     II, 16|            so great will also be the diversity between the divine and the
14    III, 15|            Gods they admit into this diversity of dispensation a community
15    III, 15|             diverse) dispensations a diversity also of names? For that
16    III, 16|          necessity to maintain their diversity as we have to resist it,
17    III, 17|             except Christ, would the diversity of spiritual proofs suitably
18    III, 18|             endeavour to introduce a diversity of opinion, simply because
19    III, 19|            own god, so that from the diversity of predictions there might
20    III, 19|          might be maintained to be a diversity of sufferers, and thereby
21    III, 19|        sufferers, and thereby also a diversity of persons. But since there
22    III, 20|              has, by contributing to diversity of opinion, either thrown
23    III, 24|             itself to a proof of the diversity (of Christs), God's kingdom
24     IV, 1 |            the law; but yet all this diversity is consistent with one and
25     IV, 1 |             innovation, introduces a diversity in those things of which
26     IV, 1 |           change is made, from which diversity arises also a contrariety.
27     IV, 1 |    contrariety in consequence of its diversity, to which there accrued
28     IV, 1 |              the same instituted the diversity also; He who foretold the
29     IV, 1 |              Pontus, is made up of a diversity of elements which are hostile
30     IV, 6 |              that he may establish a diversity between the Old and the
31     IV, 9 |        derives no advantage from the diversity which he supposes to exist
32     IV, 10|           possessed any condition of diversity. But as regards the appellation "
33     IV, 11|        because, if there existed any diversity between Christ and John,
34     IV, 24|              the comparison, it is a diversity in the causes, not in the
35     IV, 24|            does not keep in view the diversity of the causes, he is very
36     IV, 25|              supposed to be also the diversity of the services. Therefore
37     IV, 34|       conclude that there is here no diversity of gods, but only a difference
38      V, 3 |               You cannot establish a diversity of authors because there
39      V, 3 |            be one of things; for the diversity is itself proposed by one
40      V, 4 |   commandment to do good, and then a diversity of precept may argue a difference
41      V, 10|     dissolution, what becomes of the diversity in the issue? Likewise, "
42      V, 20|            what they preached with a diversity of doctrine, as if it were
43      V, 20|             as the sole cause of the diversity, he avoids inculpating the
44      V, 20|          thing would have produced a diversity (in belief.). For there
45      V, 20|          remarking and censuring the diversity. Since, however, there is
46      V, 20|               there is no blame of a diversity, there is no proof of a