bold = Main text
   Book, Chapter                                grey = Comment text

 1      I, 20|  CONTENTION OF ST. PAUL WITH ST. PETER, SHOWN TO HAVE MISTAKEN
 2      I, 20|          they adduce the case of Peter himself, and the others,
 3     IV, 3 |        then, even if he censures Peter and John and James, who
 4     IV, 3 |        all, it was possible that Peter also might have betaken
 5     IV, 5 |        to the apostles), to whom Peter and Paul conjointly bequeathed
 6     IV, 5 |  published may be affirmed to be Peter's whose interpreter Mark
 7     IV, 9 |         be drawn out), saying to Peter, when he trembled at the
 8     IV, 11|          to the law. The case of Peter escaped his memory, who,
 9     IV, 13|         CHANGING SIMON'S NAME TO PETER, AND GENTILES FROM TYRE
10     IV, 13|     changes the name of Simon to peter, inasmuch as the Creator
11     IV, 13|      each of the former. But why Peter? If it was because of the
12     IV, 21| MULTITUDE. THE CONFESSION OF ST. PETER. BEING ASHAMED OF CHRIST.
13     IV, 21|       art old! Accordingly, when Peter, who had been an eye-witness
14     IV, 21|    silence respecting it. For if Peter was unable to acknowledge
15     IV, 21|       conclusion promulged which Peter had drawn. No doubt of that,
16     IV, 21|         of that, you say; but as Peter's conclusion was a wrong
17     IV, 21|        made it clear enough that Peter had made no mistake, that
18     IV, 22|         AS MOSES AND ELIJAH. ST. PETER'S IGNORANCE ACCOUNTED FOR
19     IV, 22|         New? Well therefore does Peter, when recognizing the companions
20     IV, 22|          to prove the rapture of Peter. For how could he have known
21     IV, 22|          it is then evident that Peter, when previously asked by
22     IV, 22|     revealed by Christ, and that Peter had so far made no mistake,
23     IV, 22|        better happened than when Peter, on seeing His glory, knew
24     IV, 29|         s work. When, therefore, Peter asked whether He had spoken
25     IV, 34|       and the prophets. For even Peter would not have been able
26     IV, 41|          Him. For in the case of Peter, too, he gives you proof
27      V, 3 |     QUITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ST. PETER AND OTHER APOSTLES OF THE
28      V, 3 | CIRCUMCISION. HIS CENSURE OF ST. PETER EXPLAINED, AND RESCUED FROM
29      V, 3 |     regard to the countenance of Peter and the rest of the apostles,
30      V, 3 |          god. Rightly, then, did Peter and James and John give
31      V, 3 |          Paul, however, censures Peter for not walking straightforwardly
32      V, 3 |          who had not even spared Peter on the comparatively small