Book, Chapter

 1      I, 5 |     pre-eminence, their numerical distinction has no reason in it. Number,
 2      I, 5 |        uselessness of a numerical distinction, which was superfluous,
 3     II, 21|        instance, there is a clear distinction respecting the Sabbath's
 4    III, 13|          has no like claim to the distinction; for even in such a case
 5     IV, 9 |        contributes nothing to the distinction of Christ, as if he were
 6     IV, 10|         to Hercules. Now, if this distinction be observed, that is to
 7     IV, 15|         be left any room for that distinction whereby two gods are made;
 8     IV, 15|           are made; and when this distinction is removed, there will remain
 9     IV, 39|          for you to interpose any distinction between them, as if the
10      V, 12|         the judgment-seat and the distinction between works good and bad,
11      V, 13| accordance with our heretic's own distinction) I have called the just
12      V, 13|          Christ." What means this distinction? Has your god been subserving
13      V, 13|     righteousness of God. It is a distinction of dispensations, not of
14      V, 13|           Himself. Who can draw a distinction, and say that there are
15      V, 17|          order that he may draw a distinction with respect to the Gentiles, (
16      V, 20|        say you, according to this distinction the law did not proceed