Chapter

 1 7 |     its own form. Now, even if invisible things, whatsoever they
 2 14|       has determined God to be invisible. When Moses in Egypt desired
 3 14| misleads us, when it makes God invisible, and when it produces Him
 4 14|       be predicated that He is invisible. It will therefore follow,
 5 14|     follow, that by Him who is invisible we must understand the Father
 6 14|   contend that the Son is also invisible as being the Word, and as
 7 14|    between the Visible and the Invisible. They then go on to argue
 8 14|      He was Himself indeed the invisible Father in the name of the
 9 14|       that the Visible and the Invisible are one and the same, just
10 14|  Therefore the Visible and the Invisible are one and the same; and
11 14|    same, it follows that He is invisible as the Father, and visible
12 14|       Himself (as the Son), is invisible, in that He is God, and
13 14|        they say,) He calls the invisible Father His face. For who
14 15|      apostles a visible and an invisible God (revealed to us), under
15 15|       both the Visible and the Invisible? In order, however, to reconcile
16 15|    between the Visible and the Invisible, will not some one on the
17 15|   indeed in the flesh, but was invisible before His appearance in
18 15|       He who as the Father was invisible before the flesh, is the
19 15|         He is the same who was invisible before the incarnation,
20 15|       He is now declared to be invisible by the apostles? How, I
21 15|       and was glorified by the invisible Father. And therefore, inasmuch
22 15|        distinction between the invisible Father and the visible Son,
23 15|        King eternal, immortal, invisible, to the only God;" so that
24 15|        two the Visible and the Invisible. It was the Son, therefore,
25 16|        pass, that the Almighty Invisible God, "whom no man hath seen
26 24|   deeds. The Father indeed was invisible, as Philip had learnt in