bold = Main text
   Chapter                               grey = Comment text

 1 5 |          substance. Not that this distinction is of any practical moment.
 2 6 |          Then, again, observe the distinction between them implied in
 3 7 |   recognize the Son, I assert His distinction as second to the Father.~
 4 9 |      ESPECIALLY IN THE UNCONFUSED DISTINCTION OF THE SEVERAL PERSONS OF
 5 9 |           He is different, but by distinction; because the Father is not
 6 9 |           they be called; and the distinction indicated by the names does
 7 10|        AND SON PROVE THE PERSONAL DISTINCTION OF THE TWO. THEY CANNOT
 8 11| SCRIPTURES QUOTED IN PROOF OF THE DISTINCTION OF THE DIVINE PERSONS OF
 9 11|           clear existence of, and distinction in (the Persons of) the
10 11|          these few quotations the distinction of Persons in the Trinity
11 12|           Substance in the way of distinction, not of division. But although
12 14|           their difference by the distinction it makes between the Visible
13 15|           a manifest and personal distinction in the condition of both.
14 15|    Himself and in order to draw a distinction between the invisible Father
15 21|           this, He determined the distinction which is between the two
16 22|          JOHN QUOTED, TO SHOW THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE FATHER AND THE
17 25|     revelation, i.e. of the Son's distinction from the Father, "My God,
18 27|                        XXVII. THE DISTINCTION OF THE FATHER AND THE SON,
19 27|    ESTABLISHED, HE NOW PROVES THE DISTINCTION OF THE TWO NATURES, WHICH
20 27|      confuted on all sides on the distinction between the Father and the
21 27|       endeavour to interpret this distinction in a way which shall nevertheless
22 31|            if there were not this distinction which you are far breaking