bold = Main text
    Chapter                                 grey = Comment text

  1 1 |           he approached Him as "the Son of God;" surely intimating
  2 1 |           intimating that God had a Son, even on the testimony of
  3 1 |         temptation: "If thou be the Son of God, command that these
  4 1 |              Again: "If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down
  5 1 |      contrary, it had been only the Son of God, most likely I should
  6 2 |             one only God has also a Son, His Word, who proceeded
  7 2 |         being both Man and God, the Son of Man and the Son of God,
  8 2 |              the Son of Man and the Son of God, and to have been
  9 2 |           in the Father, and in the Son, and in the Holy Ghost.
 10 2 |         saying that the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost are
 11 2 |             Persons the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost: three,
 12 2 |           of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.
 13 3 |            is, either from having a son, or from having made himself
 14 3 |             made himself actually a son to himself, or from ministering
 15 3 |            If, moreover, there be a son belonging to him whose monarchy
 16 3 |            to be a monarchy, if the son also be taken as a sharer
 17 3 |           it is communicated to the son; and being his, it is quite
 18 3 |       division and severance in the Son and in the Holy Ghost, who
 19 4 |           as for me, who derive the Son from no other source but
 20 4 |           when I preserve it in the Son just as it was committed
 21 4 |         from the Father through the Son. Look to it then, that it
 22 4 |            of the Trinity, that the Son actually has to restore
 23 4 |          under Him,) then shall the Son also Himself be subject
 24 4 |          all." We thus see that the Son is no obstacle to the Monarchy,
 25 4 |             now administered by the Son; because with the Son it
 26 4 |           the Son; because with the Son it is still in its own state,
 27 4 |       restored to the Father by the Son. No one, therefore, will
 28 4 |            account of admitting the Son (to it), since it is certain
 29 4 |             that the Father and the Son are two separate Persons,
 30 4 |             names as Father and the Son, but also by the fact that
 31 5 |             V. THE EVOLUTION OF THE SON OR WORD OF GOD FROM THE
 32 5 |        deemed to be the same as the Son, it is only right that the
 33 5 |             question respecting the Son should be examined, as to
 34 5 |    beginning God made for Himself a Son." As there is no ground
 35 5 |            to the generation of the Son. For before all things God
 36 7 |                            VII. THE SON BY BEING DESIGNATED WORD
 37 7 |           became His first-begotten Son, because begotten before
 38 7 |            s presence: "Thou art my Son, to-day have I begotten
 39 7 |          star did I beget Thee. The Son likewise acknowledges the
 40 7 |          Spirit. He became also the Son of God, and was begotten
 41 7 |             two, the Father and the Son, God and the Word. For you
 42 7 |          thing, which is called the Son, who Himself is designated
 43 7 |            claim for it the name of Son; and while I recognize the
 44 7 |           and while I recognize the Son, I assert His distinction
 45 8 |                    VIII. THOUGH THE SON OR WORD OF GOD EMANATES
 46 8 |       matter. With us, however, the Son alone knows the Father,
 47 8 |         wherein we declare that the Son is a prolation from the
 48 8 |        indeed, to call the tree the son or offspring of the root,
 49 8 |             designation the name of Son. But still the tree is not
 50 8 |             Word the Father and His Son two. For the root and the
 51 8 |           is third from God and the Son; just as the fruit of the
 52 9 |            that the Father, and the Son, and the Spirit are inseparable
 53 9 |          the Father is one, and the Son one, and the Spirit one,
 54 9 |           among the Father, and the Son, and the Spirit. I am, moreover,
 55 9 |          identity of the Father and Son and Spirit, that it is not
 56 9 |           way of diversity that the Son differs from the Father,
 57 9 |       Father is not the same as the Son, since they differ one from
 58 9 |           entire substance, but the Son is a derivation and portion
 59 9 |         Father is distinct from the Son, being greater than the
 60 9 |              being greater than the Son, inasmuch as He who begets
 61 9 |             even as we say that the Son is also distinct from the
 62 9 |             second degree is in the Son, by reason of the order
 63 10|            VERY NAMES OF FATHER AND SON PROVE THE PERSONAL DISTINCTION
 64 10|            either the Father or the Son, and the day is not the
 65 10|          the Father the same as the Son, in such a way that Both
 66 10|            they say, made Himself a Son to Himself. Now a Father
 67 10|       Himself. Now a Father makes a Son, and a Son makes a Father;
 68 10|           Father makes a Son, and a Son makes a Father; and they
 69 10|           Father can make Himself a Son to Himself, and the Son
 70 10|             Son to Himself, and the Son render Himself a Father
 71 10|            father must needs have a son, in order to be a father;
 72 10|             a father; so likewise a son, to be a son, must have
 73 10|             likewise a son, to be a son, must have a father. It
 74 10|            to be a father, I have a son, for I never can be a son
 75 10|           son, for I never can be a son to myself; and in order
 76 10|        myself; and in order to be a son, I have a father, it being
 77 10|             a father, when I have a son; and a son, when I have
 78 10|            when I have a son; and a son, when I have a father. Now,
 79 10|             be my own father; nor a son, because I shall be my own
 80 10|           because I shall be my own son. Moreover, inasmuch as I
 81 10|          For if I must be myself my son, who am also a father, I
 82 10|       father, I now cease to have a son, since I am my own son.
 83 10|            a son, since I am my own son. But by reason of not having
 84 10|           by reason of not having a son, since I am my own son,
 85 10|            a son, since I am my own son, how can I be a father?
 86 10|       father? For I ought to have a son, in order to be a father.
 87 10|        father. Therefore I am not a son, because I have not a father,
 88 10|           not a father, who makes a son. In like manner, if I am
 89 10|            my father, who am also a son, I no longer have a father,
 90 10|          own father, how can I be a son? For I ought to have a father,
 91 10|            father, in order to be a son. I cannot therefore be a
 92 10|        father, because I have not a son, who makes a father. Now
 93 10|         since indeed He has not the Son; neither is He the Son,
 94 10|          the Son; neither is He the Son, since in like manner He
 95 10|          Father, He will not be the Son. In this way they hold the
 96 10|          neither the Father nor the Son. Well, but "with God nothing
 97 10|         Himself both a Father and a Son, contrary to the condition
 98 10|            wished to make Himself a Son to Himself, He had it in
 99 11|             that He made His Word a Son to Himself. For if He calls
100 11|        Himself. For if He calls Him Son, and if the Son is none
101 11|           calls Him Son, and if the Son is none other than He who
102 11|        Himself, He will then be the Son, and not Himself from whom
103 11|           Father is the same as the Son, do really make the same
104 11|             the Scriptures show the Son and the Father to be the
105 11|             side the Father and the Son are demonstrated to be distinct;
106 11|        where the Father said to the Son, "Thou art my Son, this
107 11|            to the Son, "Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten
108 11|             both the Father and the Son, show me some other passage
109 11|           unto Himself, I am my own Son, to-day have I begotten
110 11|             both the Father and the Son? Of one thing He was at
111 11|           if, when He was Himself a Son to Himself, He assigned
112 11|            assigned the part of His Son to be played by another,
113 11|           the Father concerning the Son by the mouth of Isaiah: "
114 11|         mouth of Isaiah: "Behold my Son, whom I have chosen; my
115 11|            also what He says to the Son: "Is it a great thing for
116 11|         Thou shouldest be called my Son to raise up the tribes of
117 11|          earth. " Hear now also the Son's utterances respecting
118 11|            of Christ, represent the Son as conversing with the Father
119 11|      speaking of the Father and the Son, in the character of a third
120 11|           the Father respecting the Son: "Lord, who hath believed
121 11|             whom He speaks, and the Son of whom He speaks. In the
122 11|             to the Father or to the Son respecting the Son, in other
123 11|           to the Son respecting the Son, in other cases to the Son
124 11|          Son, in other cases to the Son or to the Father concerning
125 12|            also acknowledge not the Son? Or was it because He was
126 12|             at once the Father, the Son, and the Spirit, that He
127 12|          because He had already His Son close at His side, as a
128 12|            The answer must be), the Son on the one hand, who was
129 12|            indeed is made, when the Son has not yet appeared: "And
130 13|             Father is Lord, and the Son also is Lord. A much more
131 13|           showing Himself to be the Son of God, because they would
132 13|            on the true and one-only Son of God. Very well! you say,
133 13|             God, the Father and the Son, and, with the addition
134 13|          the Father is God, and the Son is God, and the Holy Ghost
135 13|       designated as Lord, being the Son of Him who is both God and
136 13|           to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Ghost,
137 13|          that if the Father and the Son, are alike to be invoked,
138 13|         Word, as the Father and the Son.~
139 14|           AND THE VISIBILITY OF THE SON WITNESSED IN MANY PASSAGES
140 14|             upon the Father and the Son as being Two, that regulating
141 14|              while we recognise the Son as visible by reason of
142 14|        disposed to contend that the Son is also invisible as being
143 14|       nature for the Father and the Son, to affirm that the Father
144 14|            the Same Person with the Son. But the Scripture, as we
145 14|          effect, that if it was the Son who then spake to Moses,
146 14|           Father in the name of the Son. And by this means they
147 14|          just as the Father and the Son are the same; (and this
148 14|          Father, and visible as the Son. As if the Scripture, according
149 14|            were inapplicable to the Son, when the Father is set
150 14|          declare, however, that the Son also, considered in Himself (
151 14|       considered in Himself (as the Son), is invisible, in that
152 14|         dream, that God, I mean the Son of God, appeared to the
153 14|           seen. Well, then, was the Son visible? (Certainly not,)
154 14|           He not be the face of the Son, by reason of that authority
155 14|             must be the face of the Son. For what does the Scripture
156 14|         taken to be the face of the Son, when He is His head; for "
157 15|        ATTEST THE SAME TRUTH OF THE SON'S VISIBILITY CONTRASTED
158 15|              which I ascribe to the Son. Behold, then, I find both
159 15|             both the Father and the Son, how can He be both the
160 15|           flesh, is the same as the Son who was visible in the flesh?
161 15|          course, (the glory) of the Son, even Him who was visible,
162 15|    invisible Father and the visible Son, he makes the additional
163 15|             Word, the only begotten Son, who is in the bosom of
164 15|           He shows us also that the Son of God, which is the Word
165 15|           contrary qualities to the Son Himself mortality, accessibility
166 15|             endure the glory of the Son, had only seen the Father,
167 15|           the Invisible. It was the Son, therefore, who was always
168 15|            was always seen, and the Son who always conversed with
169 15|         conversed with men, and the Son who has always worked by
170 15|            the Father; because "the Son can do nothing of Himself,
171 15|             and thought; whilst the Son, who is in the Father's
172 15|            things were made by tile Son, and without Him was not
173 16|         EARLY MANIFESTATIONS OF THE SON OF GOD, AS RECORDED IN THE
174 16|              world were made by the Son, but also whatsoever since
175 16|           the Father who loveth the Son, and hath given all things
176 16|       committed all judgment to the Son" from the very beginning
177 16|       things of all time. It is the Son, therefore, who has been
178 16|            readily believe that the Son of God had come down into
179 16|             suitable enough for the Son, who was one day to experience
180 16|            are suitable even to the Son of God, which you are imputing
181 16|         whom He was so crowned, the Son, in fact, by the Father?
182 16|     although He is there called the Son of man), unless all these
183 16|           been believed even of the Son of God, unless they had
184 16|           through the agency of the Son, they believe that the Father
185 16|           through the agency of the Son.~
186 17|            OF DEITY, APPLIED TO THE SON, NOT, AS PRAXEAS WOULD HAVE
187 17|             the Father acted in the Son's name, than that the Son
188 17|           Son's name, than that the Son acted in the Father's; although
189 17|          Lord," that is to say, the Son in the Father's name. And
190 17|            belonged suitably to the Son also, and that the Son came
191 17|          the Son also, and that the Son came under these designations,
192 17|           is," consider whether the Son also be not indicated by
193 17|      Almighty God unsuitable to the Son. As if, indeed, He which
194 17|          almighty; whereas even the Son of the Almighty is as much
195 17|             as much almighty as the Son of God is God.~
196 18|             CORRELATIVE IDEA OF THE SON OF GOD. THE SON IS IN THE
197 18|         IDEA OF THE SON OF GOD. THE SON IS IN THE FATHER.~But what
198 18|          the Father's titles in the Son, is the statement of Scripture,
199 18|           the Same, both Father and Son. Now the Scripture is not
200 18|           there are Two, Father and Son; and is consistent with
201 18|        itself. It is clear that the Son is mentioned by it. For,
202 18|        without any detriment to the Son, it is quite possible for
203 18|            is only One, to whom the Son belongs; since He who has
204 18|         belongs; since He who has a Son ceases not on that account
205 18|             He is named without the Son. And He is named without
206 18|             He is named without the Son whensoever He is defined
207 18|    mentioned before the name of the Son; because it is the Father
208 18|            and after the Father the Son is named. Therefore "there
209 18|      declaration, He denies not the Son, but says that there is
210 18|            is no other God; and the Son is not different from the
211 18|            which nevertheless has a Son; and inasmuch as this Son
212 18|           Son; and inasmuch as this Son is undivided and inseparable
213 18|             is none else, except my Son." In short He would have
214 18|        short He would have made His Son actually another, after
215 18|             Father took care of the Son's interests, that Christ
216 18|             but in company with His Son, with whom "He stretcheth
217 19|                            XIX. THE SON IN UNION WITH THE FATHER
218 19|        sense exactly as "except the Son," who is Christ, "the Wisdom
219 19|            of God, must be the very Son of God. So that, if (He
220 19|           He did) all things by the Son, He must have stretched
221 19|    stretched out the heavens by the Son, and so not have stretched
222 19|             He says, concerning the Son, immediately afterwards: "
223 19|         confirming the words of His Son?" as, for instance, when
224 19|           said, "This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased;
225 19|               By thus attaching the Son to Himself, He becomes His
226 19|              meaning alone with His Son, even as He is one with
227 19|          even as He is one with His Son. The utterance, therefore,
228 19|          will be in like manner the Son's, "I have stretched out
229 19|        correct to say that even the Son stretched out the heaven
230 19|             that the Father and the Son must be regarded as one
231 19|            is one, and yet He has a Son, who is equally with Himself
232 19|         unwilling to allow that the Son is a distinct Person, second
233 19|          they are two as Father and Son; and this not by severance
234 19| dispensation wherein we declare the Son to be undivided and inseparable
235 21|         GOSPEL, THAT THE FATHER AND SON ARE CONSTANTLY SPOKEN OF
236 21|             but God regarded as the Son of God, not as the Father);
237 21|           of whom He is the beloved Son. He is, no doubt, ever the
238 21|           He is, no doubt, ever the Son of God, but yet not He Himself
239 21|           Himself of whom He is the Son. This (divine relationship)
240 21|             occasion: "Thou art the Son of God." And He affirmed
241 21|           two Persons: that is, the Son then on earth, whom Peter
242 21|             had confessed to be the Son of God; and the Father in
243 21|           made, that Christ was the Son of God. When He entered
244 21|             house," speaking as the Son. In His address to Nicodemus
245 21|           He gave His only-begotten Son, that whosoever believeth
246 21|        again: "For God sent not His Son into the world to condemn
247 21|           name of the only-begotten Son of God." Moreover, when
248 21|               The Father loveth the Son, and hath given all things
249 21|            He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life; and
250 21|           he that believeth not the Son shall not see life, but
251 21|             not the Father, but the Son; and elsewhere He is expressly
252 21|             called "the Christ, the Son of God," and not the Father.
253 21|         Father and I" these are the Son's words. And it was on this
254 21|       answer and say unto them, The Son can do nothing of Himself,
255 21|          doeth these also doeth the Son likewise. For the Father
256 21|           For the Father loveth the Son, and showeth Him all things
257 21|        quickeneth them, even so the Son also quickeneth whom He
258 21|     committed all judgment unto the Son, that all men should honour
259 21|           all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the
260 21|           He that honoureth not the Son, honoureth not the Father,
261 21|           Father, who hath sent the Son. Verily, verily, I say unto
262 21|         shall hear the voice of the Son of God; and when they have
263 21|           also hath He given to the Son to have eternal life in
264 21|             also, because He is the Son of man" that is, according
265 21|              even as He is also the Son of God through His Spirit.
266 21|             not the Father, but the Son, who used to be seen and
267 21|            was therefore always the Son (of whom we read) under
268 21|          that every one who saw the Son, and believed on Him, should
269 22|          BETWEEN THE FATHER AND THE SON. EVEN PRAXEAS' CLASSIC TEXT
270 22|        Father, of course but as the Son), He says to them "You are
271 22|          one being at once both the Son and the Father He certainly
272 22|             Himself both Father and Son; but that, by reason of
273 22|           words were uttered in the Son, because they read in Jeremiah, "
274 22|        appeared to Abraham, but the Son. In like manner He declares,
275 22|            Dost thou believe in the Son of God?" Then, upon the
276 22|             Himself to him, as that Son of God whom He had announced
277 22|        Father's part, who loves the Son, and submission on the Son'
278 22|          Son, and submission on the Son's, who obeys the Father'
279 22|      Himself as the Father's divine Son, and not as God Himself,
280 22|           because He said, I am the Son of God? If I do not the
281 22|           that the Father is in the Son, and the Son in the Father;
282 22|       Father is in the Son, and the Son in the Father; and so it
283 22|          the Father is one with the Son. All along did He therefore
284 22|             believed to be Two, the Son could not possibly be believed
285 23|          acknowledged Him to be the Son of God, she no more made
286 23|             the Father, said as the Son, of course: "Father, I thank
287 23|            in which He spake as the Son. (At another time) He said: "
288 23|             name." Accordingly, the Son's voice was indeed alone
289 23|        purpose of testifying to the Son: "This is my beloved Son,
290 23|            Son: "This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased;
291 23|            are voices? You have the Son on earth, you have the Father
292 23|           We are also sure that the Son, being indivisible from
293 23|          the Father willed that the Son should be regarded as on
294 23|      Himself in heaven; whither the Son also Him. self looked up,
295 23|           throne; while He made the Son to be "a little lower than
296 23|            glorify Thee again." The Son offers His request from
297 23|             both the Father and the Son? If either the Father spake
298 23|            spake from heaven to the Son when He Himself was the
299 23|             when He Himself was the Son on earth, or the Son prayed
300 23|            the Son on earth, or the Son prayed to the Father when
301 23|             when He was Himself the Son in heaven, how happens it
302 23|             how happens it that the Son made a request of His own
303 23|            of the Father, since the Son was the Father? Or, on the
304 23|        Himself, by making it to the Son, since the Father was the
305 23|            since the Father was the Son? Were we even to maintain
306 23|            in the Father and in the Son, severally, in their own
307 23|           because it is through the Son that men believe in the
308 23|        whence springs belief in the Son. "And he that seeth me,
309 23|            the betrayal, not of the Son, but of the Father Himself.
310 23|       heretic; because, even in the Son's case, the treason which
311 23|        advantage. It was, then, the Son of God, who was in the Son
312 23|          Son of God, who was in the Son of man, that was betrayed,
313 23|             afterwards: "Now is the Son of man glorified, and God
314 23|          the Father, who was in the Son of man that is in the flesh,
315 23|            Father shall glorify the Son, because He has Him within
316 24|           have known Him, or as the Son? If it was as the Father,
317 24|            the New Testament as the Son of God. In this character
318 24|    confesses Him from heaven as His Son, and as His Son glorifies
319 24|       heaven as His Son, and as His Son glorifies Him. "This is
320 24|            Him. "This is my beloved Son;" "I have glorified Him,
321 24|         ignorant of, but it was the Son; and accordingly the Lord,
322 24|            a time in a word, as the Son. And now it may be seen
323 24|             dead), so also doth the Son;" and again, "If ye had
324 24|        words, and recognised in the Son's administration of the
325 24|         only becomes visible in the Son from His mighty works, and
326 24|     understood as the same with the Son, by saying, "He who seeth
327 24|             namely, that He was the Son? And then, again, by saying, "
328 24|         professed Himself to be the Son, and to have come from the
329 24|    separately visible, and that the Son might be regarded as the
330 24|           how the Father was in the Son and the Son in the Father. "
331 24|       Father was in the Son and the Son in the Father. "The words,"
332 24|            Father who dwells in the Son makes Himself visible even
333 24|     manifested Himself to be in the Son, not indeed to the sight
334 25|             FROM THE FATHER AND THE SON AS TO THEIR PERSONAL EXISTENCE.
335 25|   distinguishing the Father and the Son, with the properties of
336 25|     connection of the Father in the Son, and of the Son in the Paraclete,
337 25|       Father in the Son, and of the Son in the Paraclete, produces
338 25|         once more recognised by the Son as in heaven, when, "lifting
339 25|             revelation, i.e. of the Son's distinction from the Father, "
340 25|            proves Himself to be the Son; for if He had been the
341 25|            as God to God? Or as the Son to the Father, and as the
342 25|            that Jesus Christ is the Son of God?" Whenever, therefore,
343 25|      identity of the Father and the Son, supposing that they serve
344 25|       Christ is the Father, but the Son.~
345 26|   PERSONALITY OF THE FATHER AND THE SON.~In addition to Philip's
346 26|           the angel himself as 'the Son of God: "The Spirit of God
347 26|            Of course, they say, the Son of God is God, and the power
348 26|             the designation of "the Son." The Spirit of God in this
349 26|         which is born of her is the Son of God. This He Himself,
350 26|    temptations: "Since Thou art the Son of God." This, accordingly,
351 26|              who Thou art, the Holy Son of God." His "Father" He
352 26|           Peter as the "Christ (the Son) of God," He does not deny
353 26|            Father known, but to His Son; and promises that, as the
354 26|           and promises that, as the Son of the Father, He will confess
355 26|      mission to the vineyard of the Son (not the Father), who was
356 26|             into the Father and the Son and the Holy Ghost, not
357 27|   DISTINCTION OF THE FATHER AND THE SON, THUS ESTABLISHED, HE NOW
358 27|         UNITED IN THE PERSON OF THE SON. THE SUBTERFUGES OF PRAXEAS
359 27|          between the Father and the Son, which we maintain without
360 27|         distinguish two, Father and Son, understanding the Son to
361 27|          and Son, understanding the Son to be flesh, that is man,
362 27|             that the Father and the Son are one and the same, do
363 27|         Christ is another, then the Son will be different from the
364 27|             the Father, because the Son is Jesus, and the Father
365 27|            thee shall be called the Son of God." Therefore, (they
366 27|            be the flesh that is the Son of God. Nay, (I answer,)
367 27|           Thing shall be called the Son of God," but only that Divine
368 27|    certainly in all respects as the Son of God and the Son of Man,
369 27|           as the Son of God and the Son of Man, being God and Man,
370 27|            words He will be Man and Son of Man. "Who was declared
371 27|          Who was declared to be the Son of God, according to the
372 27|            be God, and the Word the Son of God. We see plainly the
373 27|        angel designated Him as "the Son of God," in respect of that
374 27|          the flesh the appellation "Son of Man." In like manner,
375 27|         will you, who interpret the Son of God to be flesh, be so
376 27|           as as to show us what the Son of Man is? Will He then,
377 28|       manner say that Jesus was the Son of God, and at the same
378 28|             both that Jesus was the Son of God, and that being the
379 28|             God, and that being the Son, He was anointed by the
380 28|            Father, who anointed the Son. To the same effect are
381 28|         name of His (the Father's,) Son Jesus Christ, that "our
382 28|            the Father, and with His Son Jesus Christ." Paul, in
383 28|          our Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of the Father. (They also
384 28|           the other designation the Son of God. For precisely by
385 28|           the same Person, even the Son of God, does either name
386 28|             that Christ must be the Son, not the Father. How blind,
387 29|        saving that Christ died, the Son of the Father; and let this
388 29|           was flesh and Man and the Son of Man, not as being the
389 29|         Spirit and the Word and the Son of God. In short, since
390 29|            your side respecting the Son, we are not guilty of blasphemy
391 29|           law, is compatible to the Son (inasmuch as "Christ has
392 29|    associated in suffering with the Son. The heretics, indeed, fearing
393 29|             that the Father and the Son are Two; adding that, since
394 29|        adding that, since it iS the Son indeed who suffers, the
395 29|             fellow-suffering as the Son even is of suffering under
396 29|             Well, but how could the Son suffer, if the Father did
397 29|         Father is separate from the Son, though not from Him as
398 29|          might be capable of in the Son, yet, inasmuch as it could
399 29|            Godhead, but only in the Son, it evidently could not
400 29|         suffered It suffered in the Son. It was quite another matter
401 29|           Father to suffer with the Son in the flesh. This likewise
402 30|                        XXX. HOW THE SON WAS FORSAKEN BY THE FATHER
403 30|     forsaken me?" Either, then, the Son suffered, being "forsaken"
404 30|          inasmuch as He forsook the Son; or else, if it was the
405 30|           of God, who "forsook" His Son, so far as He handed over
406 30|         Father spa. red not His own Son." This did Isaiah before
407 30|          Father did not forsake the Son, for it was into His Father'
408 30|             Father's hands that the Son commended His. spirit. Indeed,
409 30|       corruption and decay. For the Son, therefore, to die, amounted
410 30|         forsaken by the Father. The Son, then, both dies and rises
411 30|           the Scriptures. It is the Son, too, who ascends to the
412 30|           is in the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Ghost, according
413 31|             to refuse to reckon the Son besides Him, and after the
414 31|          besides Him, and after the Son the Spirit. Now, what difference
415 31|       thenceforward the Father, the Son, and the Spirit are not
416 31|             new manner, through the Son and the Spirit, in order
417 31|         though declared through the Son and the Spirit. Away, then,
418 31|             deny the Father and the Son." For they deny the Father,
419 31|          that He is the same as the Son; and they deny the Son,
420 31|          the Son; and they deny the Son, when they suppose Him to
421 31|          that (Jesus) Christ is the Son of God" (not the Father), "
422 31|           He testifies to us of His Son. "He that hath not the Son,
423 31|          Son. "He that hath not the Son, hath not life." And that
424 31|            And that man has not the Son, who believes Him to be
425 31|            to be any other than the Son.~