Book, Chapter

 1        1, Pref  |     superior), did not set down argument among the grounds of separation.
 2        1, Pref  |        apparent plausibility of argument. For I do not know in what
 3        1, XXV   |        his mother? And the same argument applies to all the others
 4        1, XXXIV |       in silence) to furnish an argument which might defeat his purpose.
 5        1, XXXIX |    necessary to grapple with an argument advanced not in a serious
 6        1, XLV   |   having employed the following argument in the presence of many
 7        1, XLVIII|           But I shall add to my argument even those very points which
 8        1, XLIX  |         as I think, to meet the argument that neither the Jews nor
 9        2, VIII  |         as an exceedingly silly argument, it does not seem to me
10        2, XII   |        on that account, weak in argument and demonstration.~
11        2, XIX   |        then, as if bringing his argument to a conclusion, he says: "
12        2, XX    |    called by logicians an" idle argument," which is a sophism, will
13        2, XX    |    since it does not affect the argument. Now, in Ps. cviii., Judas
14        2, XX    |       which is called the "idle argument," being a quibble, is such
15        2, XX    |       physician." Now with this argument the following may be wittily
16        2, XX    |        does not at all touch my argument; nor did it follow, from
17        2, XXII  |         had brought together an argument with conclusive demonstrations
18        2, XXVIII|     carefully met this powerful argument of the Christians, as being
19        2, XXVIII|       that this was a plausible argument to be advanced against the
20        2, XXIX  |        any other, can bring any argument to prove that a pestilence
21        2, XXXII |         waste time upon such an argument as this, seeing it is well
22        2, XLV   |       superficial nature of his argument respecting the former disciples
23        2, XLVII |         asks: "By what train of argument were you led to regard him
24        2, LXVIII|      seems to me to be like the argument of those who oppose the
25        3, XXVII |     that we should have met his argument. But since he asserts that
26        3, XLII  |      kind be found in them, the argument of Celsus might have force,
27        3, LXXV  |   employed to no purpose in his argument the illustration of "one
28        4, IV    |                         IV.~The argument which Celsus employs against
29        4, VI    |       word of instruction. What argument, then, proves that it follows
30        4, XXXIII|         saw the strength of the argument which establishes the descent
31        4, XXXIII|        was unable to answer the argument which might be founded on
32        4, LVI   |        to say in answer to this argument of his, that if, since the
33        4, LVI   |        different;" for from his argument it follows that there is
34        4, LXVIII|     exactly alike. But the main argument in answer to the statements
35        4, LXXIV |        becoming confused in his argument, does not see that he is
36        5, XXXV  |                       XXXV.~The argument of Celsus appears to point
37        6, XLIX  |     offering, however, a single argument in its support, he finds
38        6, LXXIV |   seriously to apply himself to argument, he leaves serious argument
39        6, LXXIV |     argument, he leaves serious argument aside, and betakes himself
40        6, LXXIV |         it is because he has no argument of weight (for such he neither
41        6, LXXXI |         begin, God willing, the argument of the seventh, in which
42        7, IV    |         those who are mighty in argument, and most learned in matters
43        7, XII   |     such passages; for then his argument would have had much more
44        7, XIV   |     plain that Celsus feels the argument from prophecy to be very
45        7, XV    |       shown as follows. The one argument is: "If any true prophets
46        7, XV    | conclusions, we use the form of argument called "the theorem of two
47        7, XV    |   foretold such things; and the argument is formally expressed as
48        7, XV    |         illustrate this form of argument is the following: 1st, If
49        7, XVI   |    which he introduces into his argument are very different from
50        7, XX    |        law, and uses that as an argument against us. But before proceeding
51        8, XII   |         perhaps have some valid argument against the worship of others.
52        8, XII   |         have explained; and our argument against the worship of other
53        8, XXIV  |     this brief statement of the argument; for it will be evident
54        8, LI    |         seemed to him the chief argument, he should have proceeded
55        8, LXIII |     though, after struggling in argument against the insane inspirations
56        8, LXXII |    consideration and lengthened argument to prove that it is not