bold = Main text
   Book, Chapter                              grey = Comment text

 1    I, 11|         now called Isis. By what argument, then, can it be proved
 2    I, 16|                     XVI. BY WHAT ARGUMENT IT IS PROVED THAT THOSE
 3    I, 16|      manner they can answer this argument which I shall bring forward.
 4    I, 16|        they are mortal. And this argument is of the same weight when
 5    I, 16|        let him do away with this argument. For one thing so follows
 6    I, 16|      will refute even the former argument. Of the two sexes the one
 7    I, 16|         conclusion of the former argument, that there are no gods,
 8    I, 17|        see then, he says, how an argument has been drawn from physical
 9    I, 20|    matter, they resolved that an argument should be taken from the
10   II, 5 |        should I mention that the argument by which they infer that
11   II, 13|      space of thirty days; which argument is manifestly false. For
12  III, 2 |          love of wisdom. By what argument, then, can I prove that
13  III, 6 |        other hand, derived their argument from those things which
14  III, 12|         follows virtue. And this argument might have taught them in
15  III, 16|           is pressed by a clever argument; inasmuch as, when he said
16  III, 16|         to wisdom. Moreover, the argument which the same Hortensius
17  III, 17|        Why should I say that the argument is false, inasmuch as souls
18  III, 18|       For, since they feared the argument by which it is inferred
19  III, 19| sentiment is posed to the former argument. For that is based on the
20  III, 24|         or false. What course of argument, therefore, led them to
21  III, 25|    Therefore it is a very strong argument that philosophy neither
22   IV, 3 |       and conceived even by this argument: that every god who is worshipped
23   IV, 17|          laid bare, that by this argument He might admonish us not
24   IV, 28|        loves them less? And this argument has weight also from the
25    V, 15|       same man overthrew his own argument by a disputation to the
26   VI, 15|       the Peripatetics arrive by argument, that vices, since they
27  VII, 3 |         of men, yet, since their argument failed them in the consequences,
28  VII, 3 |          it was made. But if his argument were consistent, he would
29  VII, 3 |       for the sake of men has no argument. For if he says that the
30  VII, 5 |         works. What more evident argument can be brought forward that
31  VII, 5 |     system of the body afford an argument. For other animals incline
32  VII, 5 |          a dumb animal. And this argument teaches that man is born
33  VII, 6 |        Now let us mark the whole argument by a brief definition. The
34  VII, 8 |     deserted by itself. But this argument would give eternal existence
35  VII, 12|        that is a much more empty argument which says that the soul
36  VII, 20|      suffering. This question or argument is thus met by the Stoics: