bold = Main text
   Chapter                              grey = Comment text

 1 2 |       say that He neither does a kindness to any one, nor becomes
 2 2 |          anger, but leave to God kindness; for they think that a nature
 3 2 |       are at variance respecting kindness. But, that my speech may
 4 2 |  followed by me, since anger and kindness are different, and opposed
 5 2 |        be attributed to God, and kindness taken from Him; or both
 6 2 |          must be taken away, and kindness attributed to Him; or neither
 7 3 |         and is not influenced by kindness. For it is unsuitable to
 8 4 |       God, so indeed there is no kindness. For when Epicurus thought
 9 4 |         anger, He must also have kindness. Therefore, lest he should
10 4 |          plainly uninfluenced by kindness, which is the opposite feeling
11 4 |       there is neither anger nor kindness in Him, it is manifest that
12 4 |       there is neither anger nor kindness in God, let us come to that
13 5 | CONCERNING GOD; OF HIS ANGER AND KINDNESS.~The Stoics and some others
14 5 |    nature, who say that there is kindness in God, but not anger. A
15 5 |      away at once both anger and kindness. For in opposite matters
16 5 |     therefore He is not moved by kindness; but in this manner: Because
17 5 |          Because God is moved by kindness, therefore He is also liable
18 6 |      angry, since He is moved by kindness. This opinion is to be maintained
19 8 |           you take away from God kindness, or anger, or both, religion
20 16|      also contained a showing of kindness. Therefore the arguments
21 16|       will have it that He shows kindness, because this, indeed, cannot
22 17|        of cruelty rather than of kindness, it is not therefore the
23 23|         service. But justice and kindness are as immortal as the mind