Book, Chapter

 1     I, 4 |             locality about us is full of evil things, and that these evil
 2     I, 4 |              evil things, and that these evil things reach as far as the
 3     I, 16|                 would one choose such an evil thing? He, you reply, (would
 4     I, 16|          undergoing punishment is not an evil, but a good thing, if it
 5     I, 16|            maintains) that the nature of evil is neither created by the
 6    IV, 2 |            revolt of good powers over to evil (ones), and of the concord
 7    IV, 7 |                  surrendering himself to evil, is guilty of delinquency,
 8    IV, 34|               for gaining instruction in evil, in this way somebody else
 9     V, 4 |               who held converse with the evil demon of carnal concupiscence.~
10     V, 8 |                 good into (the ranks of) evil powers; and they speak of
11     V, 11|                   were not assailed) by (evil) powers. No one therefore,
12     V, 15|                the knowledge of good and evil thou mayest not eat." But
13     V, 21|                the knowledge of good and evil is the third of the maternal
14     V, 21|                power and nature of each, evil times and hosts of diseases.
15     V, 21|              fourth part, this stream of evil, just (like a current) of
16     V, 21|                  arisen the necessity of evil. When Elohim had prepared
17     V, 21|                  One replies to him, "No evil canst thou do while thou
18     V, 21|                the knowledge of good and evil," which is Naas. Now the
19     V, 21|                 originating principle of evil for the spirit of the Father
20    VI, 14|              these (tenets), not only by evil devices interpreted the
21    VI, 32|                  which is a cause of all evil things. Nay, but rather
22   VII, 17|             principle), but the other an evil one. And himself imagining
23   VII, 18|           comparison of what is good and evil, I also to-day will institute
24   VII, 19|         different principles of good and evil, and that intermediate between
25   VII, 19|                 the entire nature of the Evil Deity. Now, as he affirms,
26   VII, 19|                 affirms, the Demiurge is evil, and his works. For this
27   VII, 19|                  from all (admixture of) evil. And He has, he says, been
28    IX, 5 |                 darkness, nor light, nor evil, nor good, Heraclitus affirms,
29    IX, 21|             amongst them either to speak evil of the law, or eat what
30    IX, 24|                  choice between good and evil lies within the power of
31     X, 15|              fourth, saying, good, just, evil, and matter. But they all
32     X, 15|         denominate the just one likewise evil, whereas others that his
33     X, 15|                  tree cannot bring forth evil fruit," and the rest of
34     X, 16|                  and the fourth to be an evil one. And Apelles calls these
35     X, 29|                  not, nor does not, make evil. He makes what is glorious
36     X, 29| self-determination, brings forth what is evil, that is, accidentally;
37     X, 29|                  is, accidentally; which evil is not consummated except
38     X, 29|         meditating upon it, that what is evil is so denominated. Evil
39     X, 29|                  evil is so denominated. Evil had no existence from the
40     X, 29|              prove that God made nothing evil, and that man possesses