bold = Main text
   Book, Chapter                                 grey = Comment text

 1     I, 16|         ignorance and an erroneous conception of virtue, supposing that
 2    IV, 3 |            of the seed, and (from) conception or from parturition. And
 3    IV, 3 |          take (the horoscope) from conception, the accurate account of
 4    IV, 3 |            not able to say whether conception takes place upon the transference
 5    IV, 3 |          to a glutinous state. But conception can also (take place) after
 6    IV, 3 |         comprehend the (moment of) conception; the seed at one time being
 7    IV, 3 |         the womb well disposed for conception, and at another time dropping
 8    IV, 3 |           spent in that particular conception, and how much in this; while,
 9    IV, 3 |          accurate comprehension of conception is put out of the question.
10    IV, 3 |           of the precise moment of conception either. And, moreover, as
11    IV, 3 |         strong disposition towards conception, but at times with no such
12    IV, 4 |     horoscope from the (period of) conception. But neither can this be
13     V, 12|          the power in reference to conception which came from the rods
14     V, 12|          incarnate--just as by the conception resulting from the rod a
15    VI, 33|         viz., Ennoia and Thelesis (conception and volition). For first
16    VI, 33|             as it were, a power of conception. For conception always cherished
17    VI, 33|           power of conception. For conception always cherished the idea
18   VII, 7 |            says, (the Deity) is a "conception of conception;" but this
19   VII, 7 |         Deity) is a "conception of conception;" but this is altogether
20   VII, 9 |             whom Aristotle styles "conception of conception," but these (
21   VII, 9 |    Aristotle styles "conception of conception," but these (Basilidians) "
22   VII, 14| EXPLANATION OF CHRIST'S MIRACULOUS CONCEPTION.~The Gospel then came, says (