bold = Main text
Book, Chapter, Paragraph grey = Comment text
1 I, 1, 1 | also himself sent forth Logos and Zoe, being the father
2 I, 1, 1 | Pleroma. By the conjunction of Logos and Zoo were brought forth
3 I, 1, 1 | Bythus, and Nous, and Logos, and Anthropos. For each
4 I, 1, 1 | is Nous, with Aletheia; Logos with Zoe, and Anthropos
5 I, 1, 2 | by means of conjunction. Logos and Zoe, after producing
6 I, 1, 2 | to have been produced by Logos and Zoe. They then add that
7 I, 2, 6 | all became as Nous, and Logos, and Anthropos, and Christus.
8 I, 2, 6 | Christ, and patronymically, Logos, and Everything, because
9 I, 4, 1 | immediately deserted by that Logos who had been invisibly present
10 I, 8, 5 | and Ecclesia spring from Logos and Zoe. Moreover, he styled
11 I, 8, 5 | things and the second Tetrad, Logos and Zoe, Anthropos and Ecclesia.
12 I, 8, 5 | Monogenes, and Aletheia, and Logos, and Zoe, and Anthropos,
13 I, 9, 2 | another Saviour, and another Logos, the son of Monogenes, and
14 I, 9, 2 | Monogenes, and Aletheia, and Logos, and Zoe, and Anthropos,
15 I, 9, 3 | brought to nought. For, since Logos, and Monogenes, and Zoe,
16 I, 11, 1 | this Tetrad, again, arose Logos and Zoe, Anthropos and Ecclesia.
17 I, 11, 1 | He next states that from Logos and Zoe ten powers were
18 I, 12, 3 | produced, as others hold, from Logos and Zoe; but, on the contrary,
19 I, 12, 3 | Zoe; but, on the contrary, Logos and Zoe from Anthropos and
20 I, 12, 3 | Anthropos, by speaking, formed Logos: this is the first-born
21 I, 12, 3 | son. But Zoe followed upon Logos; and thus the first Ogdoad
22 I, 12, 4 | AEons alone who sprung from Logos and Zoe, and that on this
23 I, 12, 4 | this account he was called Logos and Zoe, thus preserving
24 I, 14, 5 | the semi-vowels represent Logos and Zoe, because they are,
25 I, 14, 5 | to them form. Thus, then, Logos and Zoe possess eight [of
26 I, 15, 1 | also, the second Tetrad, Logos and Zoe, Anthropos and Ecclesia,
27 I, 15, 3 | Anthropos and Ecclesia, Logos and Zoe. The powers, then,
28 I, 15, 3 | Gabriel took the place of Logos, the Holy Spirit that of
29 I, 17, 1 | Decad, which proceeded from Logos and Zoe. As to the Duodecad,
30 I, 24, 3 | from him, again, was born Logos, from Logos Phronesis, from
31 I, 24, 3 | again, was born Logos, from Logos Phronesis, from Phronesis
32 I, 29, 1 | these, the Father sent forth Logos. The conjunctions of Ennoea
33 I, 29, 1 | conjunctions of Ennoea and Logos, and of Aphtharsia and Christ,
34 I, 29, 2 | sent forth from Ennoea and Logos, to be a representation
35 II, 12 | APART FROM HER CONSORT; LOGOS AND SIGE COULD NOT HAVE
36 II, 12, 2 | and Nous with Aletheia. Logos and Zoe again, as being
37 II, 12, 3 | Sige, Nous with Aletheia, Logos with Zoe, and so on, as
38 II, 12, 4 | or Nous from Aletheia, or Logos from Zoe, and so on with
39 II, 12, 5 | Sige, Nous and Aletheia, Logos and Zoe, Anthropos and Ecclesia,
40 II, 12, 5 | exist in the presence of Logos (speech), or again, that
41 II, 12, 5 | speech), or again, that Logos can manifest himself in
42 II, 12, 5 | Sige is, there cannot be Logos; and where Logos is, there
43 II, 12, 5 | cannot be Logos; and where Logos is, there certainly cannot
44 II, 12, 5 | Sige. But if they say that Logos simply exists within (unexpressed),
45 II, 12, 5 | less be destroyed by the Logos within. But that he really
46 II, 12, 6 | principal Ogdoad consists of Logos and Sige, but let them [
47 II, 12, 6 | exclude either Sige or Logos; and then their first and
48 II, 12, 6 | substance, then how can Sige and Logos manifest themselves in the
49 II, 13, 2 | is most properly termed Logos (reason), from which the
50 II, 13, 2 | from which the spoken Logos (word) proceeds. But all
51 II, 13, 3 | and then, in succession, Logos from these, are, in the
52 II, 13, 6 | being sent forth, both that Logos who springs from Him will
53 II, 13, 6 | emissions proceeding from Logos. These, then, cannot in
54 II, 13, 8 | For they maintain that Logos and Zoe were sent forth
55 II, 13, 8 | conceive of an emission of Logos, that is, the Word after
56 II, 13, 8 | in their assertion that Logos was I produced by Nous.
57 II, 13, 8 | He is all Nous, and all Logos, as I have said before,
58 II, 13, 8 | and that this Nous is His Logos, will still indeed have
59 II, 13, 10| Bythus and Sage; whether Logos and Zoe again derive their
60 II, 13, 10| and Ecclesia proceed from Logos and Zoe.~
61 II, 14, 8 | AEons were sent forth by Logos and Zoe, while from Anthropos
62 II, 14, 8 | to be believed that from Logos and Zoe, being AEons, were
63 II, 15, 1 | come to pass, that from Logos and Zoe were sent forth
64 II, 17, 4 | AEons were derived from~Logos, Logos from Nous, and Nous
65 II, 17, 4 | were derived from~Logos, Logos from Nous, and Nous from
66 II, 17, 6 | production of AEons sprang from Logos, as branches from a tree,
67 II, 17, 6 | branches from a tree, since Logos has his generation from
68 II, 17, 7 | inasmuch as it originated with Logos, but flowed onwards to Sophia,
69 II, 17, 7 | tracing back the passion to Logos, who is the Nous of this
70 II, 17, 7 | who springs from Him as Logos, or rather that Nous himself,
71 II, 17, 7 | Nous himself, since he is Logos, must be perfect and impassible,
72 II, 17, 8 | as these men teach, that Logos, as occupying the third
73 II, 17, 8 | impossible in the case of the Logos of the Father. For if, existing
74 II, 17, 10| things, have produced his own Logos as an imperfect and blind
75 II, 17, 10| perfect, much more then should Logos, who is anterior to him
76 II, 17, 11| before have imparted through Logos, who was also the first-begotten~
77 II, 21, 1 | declare, were produced by Logos and Zoe. For it is unreasonable
78 II, 28, 4 | Himself, of His Ennoea, of His Logos, and Life, and Christ; and
79 II, 28, 4 | from thought, and word (logos) from intention (but which
80 II, 28, 4 | from intention (but which logos? for there is among the
81 II, 28, 4 | is among the Greeks one logos which is the principle that
82 II, 28, 5 | being all Mind, and all Logos, both speaks exactly what
83 II, 28, 5 | speaks. For His thought is Logos, and Logos is Mind, and
84 II, 28, 5 | His thought is Logos, and Logos is Mind, and Mind comprehending
85 II, 28, 5 | again, with respect to Logos, when one attributes to
86 II, 28, 5 | His greatness; and thus Logos has been far separated from
87 III, 11, 1 | Monogenes was the beginning, but Logos was the true son of Monogenes;
|