bold = Main text
   Book, Chapter, Paragraph                         grey = Comment text

 1    I,  1, 1|           they also call Charis and Sige. At last this Bythus determined
 2    I,  1, 1|          forth) in his contemporary Sige, even as seed is deposited
 3    I,  1, 1|          there are first Bythus and Sige, and then Nous and Aletheia.
 4    I,  2, 1|             the will of the Father, Sige restrained him, because
 5    I,  2, 4|            acts in conjunction with Sige, but that at other times
 6    I, 11, 1|         unspeakable), and the other Sige (silence). But of this Dyad
 7    I, 11, 5|         were anterior to Bythus and Sige, that they may appear more
 8    I, 11, 5| hermaphrodite; others, again, allot Sige to him as a spouse, that
 9    I, 13, 6|           and the mystical, eternal Sige, thou through whom the angels (
10    I, 14, 1|        matrix and receptacle of the Sige of Colorbasus, inasmuch
11    I, 14, 2|       entire name; out of which the Sige of Marcus has taught us
12    I, 14, 3|             the mouth of the silent Sige. This indeed is the body
13    I, 14, 7|           as his instrument, as the Sige of Marcus declares, the
14    I, 14, 7|             elegant Omega,"--as the Sige of Marcus, talking a deal
15    I, 15   |                                 XV. SIGE RELATES TO MARCUS THE GENERATION
16    I, 15, 1|                        The all-wise Sige then announced the production
17    I, 15, 1|      according to him, Arrhetos and Sige, Pater and Aletheia. Now
18    I, 15, 3|            as well as that power of Sige which is known by means
19    I, 15, 3|            Pater, and Arrhetus, and Sige, and Aletheia, and Ecclesia,
20    I, 15, 5|            tolerate thy nonsensical Sige, who names Him that cannot
21   II,  4, 1|         whom they speak, along with Sige, be similar in nature to
22   II, 12   |         FROM HER CONSORT; LOGOS AND SIGE COULD NOT HAVE BEEN CONTEMPORARIES.~
23   II, 12, 2|         Ennoea, whom they also term Sige, from whom again they describe
24   II, 12, 2|            any one, or his silence (Sige), should be understood apart
25   II, 12, 2|             then just as Bythus and Sige, so also Nous and Aletheia
26   II, 12, 3|             Bythus is ever one with Sige, Nous with Aletheia, Logos
27   II, 12, 5|          must admit that Bythus and Sige, Nous and Aletheia, Logos
28   II, 12, 5|           But it is impossible that Sige (silence) can exist in the
29   II, 12, 5|          himself in the presence of Sige. For these are mutually
30   II, 12, 5|       flight. In like manner, where Sige is, there cannot be Logos;
31   II, 12, 5|           there certainly cannot be Sige. But if they say that Logos
32   II, 12, 5|        exists within (unexpressed), Sige also will exist within,
33   II, 12, 6|        Ogdoad consists of Logos and Sige, but let them [as a matter
34   II, 12, 6|           necessity] exclude either Sige or Logos; and then their
35   II, 12, 6|             substance, then how can Sige and Logos manifest themselves
36   II, 13, 9|           might live. For to reckon Sige, indeed, along with their
37   II, 14, 1|          they substitute Bythus and Sige; instead of Chaos, they
38   II, 14, 2|           transferred to Bythus and Sige. Anaximander laid it down
39   IV, 35, 4|          thing is silence. For that Sige (silence) which is above