Book, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I, 1, 3| an Ogdoad, a Decad, and a Duodecad. And for this reason they
2 I, 2, 2| was the youngest of the Duodecad which sprang from Anthropos
3 I, 3, 2| production, again, of the Duodecad of the AEons, is indicated
4 I, 15, 2| spoken of, that is, the Duodecad. For the name Son, (uios)
5 I, 15, 2| out the greatness of the Duodecad. But, he alleges, before
6 I, 15, 5| Ogdoad, and a Decad, and a Duodecad; and by such multiplications,
7 I, 16, 1| and six--brings out the Duodecad. Once more, if we reckon
8 I, 16, 1| defection took place from the Duodecad. In the same way they oracularly
9 I, 16, 1| having departed also from the Duodecad, has perished; and this
10 I, 16, 2| the Ogdoad, Decad, and Duodecad], when multiplied by three,
11 I, 17, 1| Logos and Zoe. As to the Duodecad, it is indicated by the
12 I, 17, 1| manifestly shadow forth the Duodecad, the daughter of Anthropos
13 I, 17, 1| in the circle, makes the Duodecad manifest by these twelve
14 I, 17, 1| a type of the invisible Duodecad. Moreover, they declare
15 I, 17, 1| most evident type of the Duodecad and its offspring.~2.
16 I, 18, 1| AEons. The power of the Duodecad, again, was shadowed forth
17 I, 18, 1| and in his whole body the Duodecad, inasmuch as his body is
18 I, 18, 4| As to the Duodecad, in connection with which
19 I, 18, 4| twelve,--set forth their Duodecad. And then the union of all
20 II, 12, 3| the younger AEon of the Duodecad, whom they also style Sophia,
21 II, 12, 8| respecting their Ogdoad and Duodecad is a mere fable which cannot
22 II, 12, 8| explain in some other way] the Duodecad of the apostles; and [the
23 II, 24, 3| Ogdoad, and a Decad, and a Duodecad, but any sort of number
24 II, 24, 5| year a type only of that Duodecad which exists in the Pleroma;
25 II, 24, 5| an Ogdoad, a Decad, and a Duodecad. But our year is divided
|