bold = Main text
   Book, Chapter, Paragraph                      grey = Comment text

 1    I,  9, 5|      very fact forms an a priori proof that the truth proclaimed
 2    I, 14, 8|                 He instances, in proof of this, the case of infants
 3   II,  9, 1|       the present, however, that proof which is derived from those
 4   II, 14, 8|       although they have neither proof, nor testimony, nor probability,
 5   II, 16, 2|     another, and that a manifest proof [of the existence] of these
 6   II, 19, 2|         in no way susceptible of proof. For how could he have been
 7   II, 28, 8|        Moreover, they possess no proof of their system, which has
 8   II, 30, 8|          were made. They have no proof which they can give friar
 9   II, 33, 2|          He attempted no kind of proof [of his supposition], but
10  III,  3, 3|        And this is most abundant proof that there is one and the
11  III,  5, 1|        revert to the Scrip-rural proof furnished by those apostles
12  III,  9   |          DECLARED BY THE GOSPEL. PROOF OF THIS, AT THE OUTSET,
13  III, 11, 7|        of these [documents], our proof derived from them is firm
14  III, 21   | SEPTUAGINT VERSION. ARGUMENTS IN PROOF THAT CHRIST WAS BORN OF
15  III, 21, 3|      only true one, having clear proof from these Scriptures, which
16   IV,  6   |       THE HERETICS MISINTERPRET. pROOF THAT, BY THE FATHER REVEALING
17   IV, 17   |                            XVII. PROOF THAT GOD DID NOT APPOINT
18   IV, 34   |                           XXXIV. PROOF AGAINST THE MARCIONITES,
19    V, 13   |    CHRIST WE POSSESS THE HIGHEST PROOF OF THE RESURRECTION; AND
20    V, 18, 1|      impossible and incapable of proof, that preaching of the Church
21    V, 21, 3|        men might learn by actual proof that he receives incorruptibility