bold = Main text
   Book, Chapter, Paragraph                     grey = Comment text

 1    I,  9, 5|      may then at once append an argument which shall overthrow it,
 2   II, 11, 2|      may see that their plan of argument is destroyed; so that, either
 3   II, 11, 2|         to change their kind of argument against us.~
 4   II, 12, 1|      subversion of their entire argument. As to defect, this happens
 5   II, 12, 3|    again, their whole system of argument is overthrown. For they
 6   II, 12, 6|        united, then their whole argument fails to pieces. Since,
 7   II, 17, 7|    themselves destroy their own argument. For how could the youngest
 8   II, 24, 3|  because that does not suit the argument. But what of the anointing
 9   II, 24, 3|    weight, harmonize with their argument. It is therefore unreasonable
10   II, 24, 4|        in no respect with their argument, and does not harmonize
11   II, 30, 2|    through the necessity of the argument in hand, may come down to
12   II, 30, 2|          by descending to their argument, may often refute them by
13  III, 15, 3|      revert to the same line of argument [hitherto pursued]. For
14  III, 18   |   CONTINUATION OF THE FOREGOING ARGUMENT. PROOFS FROM THE WRITINGS
15   IV,  5   |    AUTHOR RETURNS TO HIS FORMER ARGUMENT, AND SHOWS THAT THERE WAS
16   IV,  7   | RECAPITULATION OF THE FOREGOING ARGUMENT, SHOWING THAT ABRAHAM, THROUGH
17   IV, 30   |      XXX. REFUTATION OF ANOTHER ARGUMENT ADDUCED BY THE MARCIONITES,