bold = Main text
   Chapter                               grey = Comment text

 1 1 |         method in treating of the resurrection. For in regard to this subject
 2 2 |                             II. A RESURRECTION IS NOT IMPOSSIBLE.~ Let
 3 2 |           or doubt concerning the resurrection, to form their opinion on
 4 2 |           to demonstrate that the resurrection is utterly unworthy of credit.
 5 4 |          the impossibility of the resurrection, on the ground that the
 6 8 |        the same body, and for the resurrection and life of that which was
 7 10|          THAT GOD DOES NOT WILL A RESURRECTION.~ For that which is not
 8 10|          cannot be injured by the resurrection of men, for the resurrection
 9 10|      resurrection of men, for the resurrection of men is no hindrance to
10 10|       have no existence after the resurrection, and no wrong can be done
11 10|         did not share in the same resurrection. For to creatures whose
12 11|          is very evident that the resurrection of dissolved bodies is a
13 11|           doctrine concerning the resurrection, both from the cause itself,
14 12|             XII. ARGUMENT FOR THE RESURRECTION. FROM THE PURPOSE CONTEMPLATED
15 12|         appearance, or size), the resurrection. For the resurrection is
16 12|         the resurrection. For the resurrection is a species of change,
17 13|    continuance is a pledge of the resurrection, without which man could
18 13|           is quite clear that the resurrection is plainly proved by the
19 14|                          XIV. THE RESURRECTION DOES NOT REST SOLELY ON
20 14|       judgment whether there is a resurrection or not, first to consider
21 14|         the work of creation, the resurrection is clearly demonstrated,
22 14|     discussing the subject of the resurrection, have rested the whole cause
23 14|     deeming that the cause of the resurrection is the judgment. But the
24 14|    judgment were the cause of the resurrection, it would of course follow
25 14|           our conclusion that the resurrection takes place not for the
26 15|              XV. ARGUMENT FOR THE RESURRECTION FROM THE NATURE OF MAN.~
27 15|      sufficient to prove that the resurrection follows by natural sequence
28 15|          force as evidence of the resurrection. For if the whole nature
29 15|           necessity proves that a resurrection will follow of the dead
30 15|          he rise again. For if no resurrection were to take place, the
31 16|       CONSEQUENT ARGUMENT FOR THE RESURRECTION.~ And let no one think it
32 16|      meant by the doctrine of the resurrection; and, looking to this, we
33 16|          therefore despair of the resurrection. For although the relaxation
34 16| dissolution, such as involves the resurrection, although for a time it
35 17|        NOW TRACE IN MAN RENDERS A RESURRECTION PROBABLE.~ For this nature
36 17|       ground for believing in the resurrection, since it is safer and stronger
37 18|         THERE WILL THEREFORE BE A RESURRECTION.~ The arguments I just now
38 18|     establishing the truth of the resurrection, are all of the same kind,
39 18|     having been made alive by the resurrection, and the parts that were
40 19|           BEASTS IF THERE WERE NO RESURRECTION.~ In replying, then, to
41 23|        with this to guarantee the resurrection, suffices for us, it would
42 23|         be thought concerning the resurrection, and to adapt to the capacity
43 24|            XXIV. ARGUMENT FOR THE RESURRECTION FROM THE CHIEF END OF MAN.~
44 25|      there must by all means be a resurrection of the bodies which are
45 25|          and possible only by the resurrection; for if this takes place,