Part

 1 1    |           everynotion of established authority under the pretext of course
 2 1    |             notions of "dogma" and ''authority" are now considered by many
 3 1    |            of a certain supernatural authority -constitutes no doubt a
 4 1    |           can be said that dogma and authority areconsidered to be notions
 5 1    |         ascause and causality, since authority is understood as being the
 6 1    |        sufficientlythe nature of the authority from which it is derived.
 7 1    |       sufficiently" the nature ofthe authority from which it comes without
 8 1    |  unchangeably single meaning. Nor is authority understood as acompulsive
 9 2    | trustworthinessand competence of the authority which pronounced it, for
10 2    |          typically at least, greater authority as the direct andundisputed
11 3    |                           The sacred authority and Theanthropicvalidity
12 3    |              between themeanings of "authority" and "validity" by carefully
13 3    |              each. When speaking of "authority", we do not meanof course
14 3    |         these terms, it is clear why"authority" is identified only with
15 3    |              the main meaning of the"authority" of dogma, as its transcendent
16 3    |       product and secondary notionof"authority" which is very close to
17 3(14)|        writing of herown as an equal authority to the sacred texts which
18 3    |        thesupreme responsibility and authority recognised in him by the