Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library
Archbishop Stylianos
Being and non-being

IntraText - Concordances

(Hapax - words occurring once)
    Text
1 Text| sandals on his feet' "(Acts 13:25).~We should note especially 2 Text| a chosen vessel" (Acts 9:15) and "stewards of the mysteries 3 Text| that do not exist" (Rom. 4:17).~St. Paul however narrows 4 Text| who lives in me" (Gal. 2:20).~All the Saints of the 5 Text| sandals on his feet' "(Acts 13:25).~We should note especially 6 Text| complete His work" (John 4:34).~Just as in the initial 7 Text| above every name" (Phil. 2:6-9).~From this supremely 8 Text| gift of Christ" (Ephes. 4:7) is shown forth as "a chosen 9 Text| if they were eventually able to be characterised as those 10 Text| opposite, kenosis is the abundance of love and power and life.~ 11 | according 12 Text| of their own "feats" or "achievements", but only of their "sufferings", 13 Text| of responsibility for his actions.~In the field of Biblical 14 | after 15 | again 16 Text| ecstasy' of an unprecedented 'alchemy'. And G. Xenopoulos satirised 17 | alone 18 | already 19 Text| saying he was "no one".~If we analyse each of the above cases, 20 Text| in Biblical cosmology and anthropology, and 'vanity' therefore 21 | any 22 Text| identity, responded completely apophatically by saying he was "no one".~ 23 Text| concerning him in the Acts of the Apostles, "As John was finishing 24 Text| words, which at first glance appear to be scandalous, being ' 25 Text| journey, to be the most appropriate and convenient time to claim 26 Text| basic question of Plato. Approximately the same problem was expressed 27 Text| new - there is also the archetypal figure of Ulysses who, when 28 Text| characteristic and sublime archetype for us is the Son and Word 29 Text| Son and Word of God the "arm" of the Father.~The Apostle 30 Text| figure of Ulysses who, when asked about his identity, responded 31 Text| seeing his corruptible life 'assimilated' completely by Christ.~We 32 Text| does not mean reduction or bankruptcy. Precisely the opposite, 33 Text| Philosophy, is the most basic question of Plato. Approximately 34 Text| senses". This is the "new bearing", which is said to have 35 Text| Rimbaud "I am someone else" bears witness to an incandescent ' 36 | became 37 | because 38 | become 39 | been 40 | beginning 41 Text| indifferent to our moral behaviour, but rather influences it 42 | beyond 43 Text| has no place either (the book of Ecclesiastes is a special 44 Text| the form of a slave, being born in human likeness. And being 45 Text| decays', the inner man is 'built up'. And when he has 'emptied' 46 Text| or whether you become a burnt offering through a martyr' 47 Text| If the entire Creation came "out of nothing" through 48 | can 49 Text| Ecclesiastes is a special case, but this is not the time 50 Text| analyse each of the above cases, we shall see that, together, 51 Text| beings.~God created both categories of personal beings (angels 52 Text| originally saw the direct causal relationship between the 53 Text| the earth.~The concept of 'chance' has no place in Biblical 54 Text| were eventually able to be characterised as those who "suffered the 55 Text| 7) is shown forth as "a chosen vessel" (Acts 9:15) and " 56 Text| appropriate and convenient time to claim praise and self-attestation. 57 Text| indicative testimonies in classical literature - both the older 58 Text| Homeric "no one", it is clear that we have here a device 59 Text| end, namely the greatest climax of his life.~It is at this 60 Text| earthly journey draws to a close, the more he feels that 61 Text| everything is made and co-exists from the moment that the 62 Text| human beings) in order to "collaborate" in the salvation of the 63 Text| am not he. No, but one is coming after me; I am not worthy 64 Text| this is not the time to comment upon it).~Since everything 65 Text| which is infinite love and communion - called "interpenetration" 66 Text| of Him who sent me and to complete His work" (John 4:34).~Just 67 Text| totally new form of aesthetic compunction or poetic magic, the power 68 Text| differs from the earth.~The concept of 'chance' has no place 69 Text| incompatible' with the conception of divinity at that time. 70 Text| completely by Christ.~We read concerning him in the Acts of the Apostles, " 71 Text| himself, and hastens to confess the words "not I". For this 72 Text| upon reaching the highest conquest, sees himself precisely 73 Text| sufferings", and in fact considered themselves privileged if 74 Text| Christ. The secular person considers the 'fulfilment' of work, 75 Text| the divine essence than to continually fulfil "the will of the 76 Text| the most appropriate and convenient time to claim praise and 77 Text| the mysteries of God" (1 Cor. 4:1).~The notion precisely 78 Text| means that he makes the correlation of his life with Christ - 79 Text| made worthy of seeing his corruptible life 'assimilated' completely 80 Text| has no place in Biblical cosmology and anthropology, and 'vanity' 81 Text| subsequently, in the whole course of the divine economy, that 82 Text| death - even death on the Cross. Therefore God also highly 83 Text| have here a device of the cunning Ulysses, to rid himself 84 Text| just as the outer man 'decays', the inner man is 'built 85 Text| difficult, as it demands a new decision for obedience and sacrifice 86 Text| angels are on the one hand defined in theology as "liturgical 87 Text| probably more difficult, as it demands a new decision for obedience 88 Text| measure of being in God is derived.~If the "will of the Father" 89 Text| the highest 'due', ie. the determinant power for life and death, 90 Text| human, on the other hand, by developing "according to the measure 91 Text| beginning, nor upon the further development of his work, but at the 92 Text| clear that we have here a device of the cunning Ulysses, 93 | did 94 Text| existence can be radically differentiated from existence in Christ. 95 Text| the first is probably more difficult, as it demands a new decision 96 Text| vigilance in the form of a dilemma within the framework of 97 Text| Paul originally saw the direct causal relationship between 98 Text| but rather influences it directly, we are not entitled to 99 Text| magic, the power of which "dismantles all the senses". This is 100 Text| with the conception of divinity at that time. St. Paul said, " 101 Text| he will exclaim almost doxologically: "It is no longer I who 102 Text| same problem was expressed dramatically by Shakespeare with the 103 Text| more his earthly journey draws to a close, the more he 104 Text| Father" is the highest 'due', ie. the determinant power 105 Text| This is precisely why the early Fathers of the Church called 106 Text| the sun differs from the earth.~The concept of 'chance' 107 Text| wrong when he said, "it is easier to sacrifice your life than 108 Text| place either (the book of Ecclesiastes is a special case, but this 109 Text| witness to an incandescent 'ecstasy' of an unprecedented 'alchemy'. 110 | either 111 | else 112 Text| creation. This is why he emphasises what a great benefaction 113 | end 114 Text| the divine will.~If the entire Creation came "out of nothing" 115 Text| it directly, we are not entitled to call this simply a philosophical 116 Text| of the gift of Christ" (Ephes. 4:7) is shown forth as " 117 Text| of God, He did not regard equality with God as something to 118 Text| Acts 13:25).~We should note especially the phrase "as he was finishing...", 119 Text| Just as in the initial establishment of all things, at the point 120 Text| privileged if they were eventually able to be characterised 121 Text| Therefore God also highly exalted Him and gave Him the name 122 Text| himself completely, he will exclaim almost doxologically: "It 123 Text| To be or not to be". The exclamation of the French surrealist 124 Text| existence the things that do not exist" (Rom. 4:17).~St. Paul however 125 Text| Rimbaud we have, more than existential agony, a totally new form 126 Text| with God as something to be exploited, but emptied Himself, taking 127 Text| Shakespeare, the question expresses an intense moral and social 128 Text| no greater possibility of expressing the divine essence than 129 Text| God is pronounced - as an expression of the divine will ("God 130 Text| empty' the futility of the fallen world silently, drop by 131 Text| by Shakespeare with the familiar phrase "To be or not to 132 Text| witty tragicality of social farce.~As for the Homeric "no 133 Text| never spoke of their own "feats" or "achievements", but 134 Text| to a close, the more he feels that to be 'spent' does 135 Text| thong of the sandals on his feet' "(Acts 13:25).~We should 136 Text| for his actions.~In the field of Biblical Revelation, 137 Text| there is also the archetypal figure of Ulysses who, when asked 138 Text| Apostle Paul writes the following unprecedented words, which 139 Text| He said unreservedly: "My food is to do the will of Him 140 Text| example of St. John the Forerunner is similar to that of the 141 Text| Christ" (Ephes. 4:7) is shown forth as "a chosen vessel" (Acts 142 | found 143 Text| from the moment that the founding word of God is pronounced - 144 Text| of a dilemma within the framework of aesthetic play writing.~ 145 Text| The exclamation of the French surrealist A. Rimbaud "I 146 Text| essence than to continually fulfil "the will of the Father". 147 Text| expressed by the Son, but also fulfilled in the Holy Spirit, through 148 | further 149 Text| whether you 'empty' the futility of the fallen world silently, 150 Text| unprecedented 'alchemy'. And G. Xenopoulos satirised the 151 Text| Christ who lives in me" (Gal. 2:20).~All the Saints of 152 Text| present us with a wondrous gamut of the natural person's 153 Text| also highly exalted Him and gave Him the name that is above 154 Text| according to the measure of the gift of Christ" (Ephes. 4:7) 155 Text| unknown. However, the meaning given to this differs from the 156 Text| unprecedented words, which at first glance appear to be scandalous, 157 Text| Xenopoulos, the problem does not go beyond the witty tragicality 158 Text| why he emphasises what a great benefaction it was for God 159 Text| the Father", justly has no greater possibility of expressing 160 Text| but at the end, namely the greatest climax of his life.~It is 161 Text| empty' of himself, and hastens to confess the words "not 162 | here 163 Text| this way, from the solitary Hermits and Stylites, to the most 164 Text| Cross. Therefore God also highly exalted Him and gave Him 165 Text| non being”, known from the History of Philosophy, is the most 166 Text| but also fulfilled in the Holy Spirit, through all works 167 Text| social farce.~As for the Homeric "no one", it is clear that 168 | how 169 Text| found in human form, He humbled Himself and became obedient 170 Text| of divine life, is almost identical to the notion of kenosis, 171 Text| who, when asked about his identity, responded completely apophatically 172 Text| And if this is true for inanimate objects, how much more so 173 Text| else" bears witness to an incandescent 'ecstasy' of an unprecedented ' 174 Text| to be scandalous, being 'incompatible' with the conception of 175 Text| reduced', but rather that he 'increases' in Christ. He recognizes 176 Text| not me".~Parallel to these indicative testimonies in classical 177 Text| because this agony is not indifferent to our moral behaviour, 178 Text| Trinitarian life, which is infinite love and communion - called " 179 Text| moral behaviour, but rather influences it directly, we are not 180 Text| John 4:34).~Just as in the initial establishment of all things, 181 Text| already mentioned secular instances, as much as the sun differs 182 Text| objects, how much more so for intellectual and spiritual beings, ie. 183 Text| the question expresses an intense moral and social vigilance 184 Text| and communion - called "interpenetration" by the Fathers - between 185 | into 186 Text| which is said to have been introduced to poetry by Rimbaud.~In 187 | its 188 Text| essence with the Father", justly has no greater possibility 189 Text| being” and “non being”, known from the History of Philosophy, 190 | last 191 Text| slave, being born in human likeness. And being found in human 192 Text| testimonies in classical literature - both the older and the 193 Text| defined in theology as "liturgical spirits sent for service". 194 Text| It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in 195 Text| who live, but Christ who lives in me" (Gal. 2:20).~All 196 Text| doxologically: "It is no longer I who live, but Christ who 197 Text| aesthetic compunction or poetic magic, the power of which "dismantles 198 Text| only natural that this is maintained in existence again only 199 | makes 200 Text| your earthly life. Perhaps Malaparte was not wrong when he said, " 201 Text| burnt offering through a martyr's death. In fact, the first 202 Text| Stylites, to the most tortured martyrs. For it does not matter 203 Text| means unknown. However, the meaning given to this differs from 204 Text| differs from the already mentioned secular instances, as much 205 Text| is presented with almost metaphysical agony, a matter of life 206 Text| the most characteristic 'mode of existence' of divine 207 Text| self-evident that even the last mustard seed has its place and value - 208 | My 209 Text| 15) and "stewards of the mysteries of God" (1 Cor. 4:1).~The 210 Text| 4:17).~St. Paul however narrows that general benefaction 211 Text| economy, that being in Christ necessarily presupposes the fulfilment 212 | never 213 Text| place and value - which is non-negotiable - in the whole plan of the 214 | nor 215 Text| Acts 13:25).~We should note especially the phrase "as 216 Text| demands a new decision for obedience and sacrifice at each moment 217 Text| humbled Himself and became obedient to the point of death - 218 Text| this is true for inanimate objects, how much more so for intellectual 219 Text| whether you become a burnt offering through a martyr's death. 220 Text| Biblical Revelation, namely the Old and New Testament, the same 221 Text| classical literature - both the older and the new - there is also 222 Text| bankruptcy. Precisely the opposite, kenosis is the abundance 223 Text| angels and human beings) in order to "collaborate" in the 224 Text| Father.~The Apostle Paul originally saw the direct causal relationship 225 | other 226 | our 227 Text| recognizes that, just as the outer man 'decays', the inner 228 Text| to rid himself from the outset of every notion of responsibility 229 Text| theatrical work "I am not me".~Parallel to these indicative testimonies 230 Text| benefaction to human beings in particular, and indeed to his own self. 231 | Perhaps 232 Text| between the three divine Persons, is expressed only as 'kenosis'. 233 Text| that is above every name" (Phil. 2:6-9).~From this supremely 234 Text| known from the History of Philosophy, is the most basic question 235 Text| non-negotiable - in the whole plan of the divine economy. And 236 Text| the framework of aesthetic play writing.~In A. Rimbaud we 237 Text| aesthetic compunction or poetic magic, the power of which " 238 Text| have been introduced to poetry by Rimbaud.~In Xenopoulos, 239 Text| justly has no greater possibility of expressing the divine 240 Text| convenient time to claim praise and self-attestation. The 241 Text| see that, together, they present us with a wondrous gamut 242 Text| In Plato, the problem is presented with almost metaphysical 243 Text| being in Christ necessarily presupposes the fulfilment of the divine 244 Text| fact considered themselves privileged if they were eventually 245 Text| death. In fact, the first is probably more difficult, as it demands 246 Text| founding word of God is pronounced - as an expression of the 247 Text| person's philosophical, psychological and even sociological questioning.~ 248 Text| psychological and even sociological questioning.~In Plato, the problem is 249 Text| worldly existence can be radically differentiated from existence 250 Text| than your self!"~At any rate, the example of St. John 251 Text| struggles in Christ, upon reaching the highest conquest, sees 252 Text| completely by Christ.~We read concerning him in the Acts 253 Text| increases' in Christ. He recognizes that, just as the outer 254 Text| does not mean that he is 'reduced', but rather that he 'increases' 255 Text| self-emptying does not mean reduction or bankruptcy. Precisely 256 Text| form of God, He did not regard equality with God as something 257 Text| originally saw the direct causal relationship between the divine will 258 Text| asked about his identity, responded completely apophatically 259 Text| outset of every notion of responsibility for his actions.~In the 260 Text| notion precisely of "person", revealed by the Trinitarian God Himself 261 Text| In the field of Biblical Revelation, namely the Old and New 262 Text| the cunning Ulysses, to rid himself from the outset 263 Text| things that do not exist" (Rom. 4:17).~St. Paul however 264 Text| to "collaborate" in the salvation of the world. That is why 265 Text| to untie the thong of the sandals on his feet' "(Acts 13:25).~ 266 Text| alchemy'. And G. Xenopoulos satirised the problem with the theatrical 267 Text| fulfilment' of work, that is to say the completion of the journey, 268 Text| completely apophatically by saying he was "no one".~If we analyse 269 Text| first glance appear to be scandalous, being 'incompatible' with 270 Text| the above cases, we shall see that, together, they present 271 Text| that even the last mustard seed has its place and value - 272 Text| who was made worthy of seeing his corruptible life 'assimilated' 273 Text| reaching the highest conquest, sees himself precisely then as 274 Text| time to claim praise and self-attestation. The one who struggles in 275 Text| very good', then it is self-evident that even the last mustard 276 Text| which "dismantles all the senses". This is the "new bearing", 277 Text| liturgical spirits sent for service". The human, on the other 278 Text| through all works of the seven-day Creation. This is precisely 279 | shall 280 | should 281 Text| Christ" (Ephes. 4:7) is shown forth as "a chosen vessel" ( 282 Text| futility of the fallen world silently, drop by drop from your 283 Text| John the Forerunner is similar to that of the Apostle Paul, 284 Text| not entitled to call this simply a philosophical problem.~ 285 | Since 286 Text| Himself, taking the form of a slave, being born in human likeness. 287 Text| psychological and even sociological questioning.~In Plato, the 288 Text| completion in this way, from the solitary Hermits and Stylites, to 289 | someone 290 | something 291 Text| book of Ecclesiastes is a special case, but this is not the 292 Text| more he feels that to be 'spent' does not mean that he is ' 293 Text| also fulfilled in the Holy Spirit, through all works of the 294 Text| theology as "liturgical spirits sent for service". The human, 295 Text| so for intellectual and spiritual beings, ie. angels and human 296 Text| reason, the Saints never spoke of their own "feats" or " 297 Text| vessel" (Acts 9:15) and "stewards of the mysteries of God" ( 298 Text| Saints of the Church saw the struggle of completion in this way, 299 Text| self-attestation. The one who struggles in Christ, upon reaching 300 Text| the solitary Hermits and Stylites, to the most tortured martyrs. 301 Text| most characteristic and sublime archetype for us is the 302 Text| and it was so") - so it is subsequently, in the whole course of 303 Text| characterised as those who "suffered the divine".~ ~ 304 Text| achievements", but only of their "sufferings", and in fact considered 305 Text| instances, as much as the sun differs from the earth.~ 306 Text| work, he said, 'What do you suppose that I am? I am not he. 307 Text| Phil. 2:6-9).~From this supremely unique example of Christ 308 Text| exclamation of the French surrealist A. Rimbaud "I am someone 309 | taking 310 Text| namely the Old and New Testament, the same question of 'being' 311 Text| Parallel to these indicative testimonies in classical literature - 312 Text| satirised the problem with the theatrical work "I am not me".~Parallel 313 | themselves 314 Text| the one hand defined in theology as "liturgical spirits sent 315 | there 316 | these 317 Text| not worthy to untie the thong of the sandals on his feet' "( 318 | those 319 | Though 320 Text| the Fathers - between the three divine Persons, is expressed 321 | together 322 Text| and Stylites, to the most tortured martyrs. For it does not 323 Text| than existential agony, a totally new form of aesthetic compunction 324 | towards 325 Text| not go beyond the witty tragicality of social farce.~As for 326 Text| 9).~From this supremely unique example of Christ Himself, 327 Text| non being' is by no means unknown. However, the meaning given 328 Text| For this reason He said unreservedly: "My food is to do the will 329 Text| after me; I am not worthy to untie the thong of the sandals 330 | up 331 Text| mustard seed has its place and value - which is non-negotiable - 332 Text| cosmology and anthropology, and 'vanity' therefore has no place 333 | very 334 Text| shown forth as "a chosen vessel" (Acts 9:15) and "stewards 335 Text| intense moral and social vigilance in the form of a dilemma 336 Text| his life.~It is at this vital point that worldly existence 337 Text| struggle of completion in this way, from the solitary Hermits 338 | were 339 | whom 340 | within 341 Text| I am someone else" bears witness to an incandescent 'ecstasy' 342 Text| problem does not go beyond the witty tragicality of social farce.~ 343 Text| they present us with a wondrous gamut of the natural person' 344 Text| Holy Spirit, through all works of the seven-day Creation. 345 Text| at this vital point that worldly existence can be radically 346 Text| about whom the Apostle Paul writes the following unprecedented 347 Text| framework of aesthetic play writing.~In A. Rimbaud we have, 348 Text| Perhaps Malaparte was not wrong when he said, "it is easier 349 | Yet


Best viewed with any browser at 800x600 or 768x1024 on Tablet PC
IntraText® (V89) - Some rights reserved by EuloTech SRL - 1996-2007. Content in this page is licensed under a Creative Commons License