Document

 1 3 |    gennhtos even in his Godhead. See esp. Joann. ~Damasc. de
 2 3 |         his own doctrinal views; see Bull Def. Fid. Nic. ii.
 3 3 |         double and the single v. See e.g. Justin ~Dial. 2, with
 4 3 |       Lib. Arbitr., p. 57; Jahn (see Jahn's note 11, p. 122);
 5 3 |    writer's heretical theology): see also viii. ~16, and comp.
 6 3 |       the difference of meaning. See for ~example Epiphanius,
 7 3 |         ou ~ ths auths ~ ousas . See also the ~arguments against
 8 5 |       very ~interesting history. See Westcott's account of it,
 9 5 |          canon of Constantinople(see ~below), and of which Socrates
10 5 |        more natural ~derivation, see "the holy canon" in the
11 5 |        the canon of the church;" see also ~George of Laodicea
12 5 |       called kan <ss228> nikos , see Cyril ~of Jerusalem, Procatech.(
13 9 |     solemn ~Christian sacrifice: see my notes on Didache, 14.
14 9 |        into the Kingdom of God ~(see Didache, 9. 10). Therefore,
15 9 |          than an act ~of prayer (See Apol. I. 14, 65-67; Dial.
16 10|    claims. If any ~one wishes to see a list of the most famous
17 10|      ancient privileges ~of that see which he had invaded. The
18 10|            There only remains to see what were the bounds of
19 10|     Patriarchate of Antioch. The see of Antioch had, ~as we know,
20 12|         it was only a ~suffragan see to the great Church of Caesarea.
21 12|   dignity to the occupant of the see; at all events Eusebius(
22 12|    successive steps by which the See of Jerusalem ~rose from
23 12|         was the elevation of the see of ~Jerusalem from the subordinate
24 12|   suffragan to the ~metropolitan see of Caesarea, to a primary
25 12|      jurisdiction over the great see of Antioch, from which he
26 12|      asserted for "the apostolic see of ~Jerusalem the same rank
27 12|     authority with the apostolic see of Rome" ~(Labbe, Concil.
28 12|     sanction from the ~apostolic See ("ut nulla illicitis conatibus
29 12|     after Rome as an apostolical see, provoked no open remonstrance,
30 12|         undoubted claims of the ~see of Caesarea. The terms arranged
31 12|           ancient dignity of the see of Antioch (Leo Magn. Ep.
32 16|            kwris ~ ~ prosforas ) see the notes to Ancyra, Canon
33 18|   Christian soldiers to a stand (see Routh. ~Scr. Opusc. i. 410),
34 18|   carefully "examined." Again we see the ~earnest resolution
35 18|         involved them in no sin (see below ~on Eph. 5, Chalc.
36 18|          interpolation. I do not see how ~dropping the "not"
37 23| translation of a bishop from the see for which he was consecrated ~
38 23|      translated from his obscure see Sasima(not Nazianzum as ~
39 23|         being ~taken" to another see. And this was the practice
40 23|       translations to the first ~see of the Church."(1)~ ~But
41 23|     second when a ~bishop, whose see has been laid low by the
42 23|          transferred to ~another see which is vacant, metabasis ;
43 23|       either having or lacking a see, seizes on a bishopric ~
44 23|      especially when it was ~the See of Constantinople that was
45 23|         appoint to the Primatial See of Canterbury a bishop already ~
46 26|          a full account of which see Morinus De SS. Ordinat.
47 26|   observes.~ ~From this canon we see that the Nicene, fathers
48 29|      adopt this practice; for we see in ~the Acts of the Apostles(
49 30|          et seqq.[2ded.])~Let us see first what is the testimony
50 30|         closer consideration ~we see, as Hardouin has proved,
51 31|       over them, the lord of the see of the Divine Peter at Rome, ~
52 31|         Alexandria, which is the see of Mark. And the third is
53 31|        of ~Ephesus, which is the see of John the Divine who speaks
54 31|       Antioch, which is another ~see of Peter. And let all the
55 32|          affirms this(c. 10). We see that the Greek ~Church wishes
56 34|         more desirable, ~than to see this festival, through which