Document
1 3 | gennhtos even in his Godhead. See esp. Joann. ~Damasc. de
2 3 | his own doctrinal views; see Bull Def. Fid. Nic. ii.
3 3 | double and the single v. See e.g. Justin ~Dial. 2, with
4 3 | Lib. Arbitr., p. 57; Jahn (see Jahn's note 11, p. 122);
5 3 | writer's heretical theology): see also viii. ~16, and comp.
6 3 | the difference of meaning. See for ~example Epiphanius,
7 3 | ou ~ ths auths ~ ousas . See also the ~arguments against
8 5 | very ~interesting history. See Westcott's account of it,
9 5 | canon of Constantinople(see ~below), and of which Socrates
10 5 | more natural ~derivation, see "the holy canon" in the
11 5 | the canon of the church;" see also ~George of Laodicea
12 5 | called kan <ss228> nikos , see Cyril ~of Jerusalem, Procatech.(
13 9 | solemn ~Christian sacrifice: see my notes on Didache, 14.
14 9 | into the Kingdom of God ~(see Didache, 9. 10). Therefore,
15 9 | than an act ~of prayer (See Apol. I. 14, 65-67; Dial.
16 10| claims. If any ~one wishes to see a list of the most famous
17 10| ancient privileges ~of that see which he had invaded. The
18 10| There only remains to see what were the bounds of
19 10| Patriarchate of Antioch. The see of Antioch had, ~as we know,
20 12| it was only a ~suffragan see to the great Church of Caesarea.
21 12| dignity to the occupant of the see; at all events Eusebius(
22 12| successive steps by which the See of Jerusalem ~rose from
23 12| was the elevation of the see of ~Jerusalem from the subordinate
24 12| suffragan to the ~metropolitan see of Caesarea, to a primary
25 12| jurisdiction over the great see of Antioch, from which he
26 12| asserted for "the apostolic see of ~Jerusalem the same rank
27 12| authority with the apostolic see of Rome" ~(Labbe, Concil.
28 12| sanction from the ~apostolic See ("ut nulla illicitis conatibus
29 12| after Rome as an apostolical see, provoked no open remonstrance,
30 12| undoubted claims of the ~see of Caesarea. The terms arranged
31 12| ancient dignity of the see of Antioch (Leo Magn. Ep.
32 16| kwris ~ ~ prosforas ) see the notes to Ancyra, Canon
33 18| Christian soldiers to a stand (see Routh. ~Scr. Opusc. i. 410),
34 18| carefully "examined." Again we see the ~earnest resolution
35 18| involved them in no sin (see below ~on Eph. 5, Chalc.
36 18| interpolation. I do not see how ~dropping the "not"
37 23| translation of a bishop from the see for which he was consecrated ~
38 23| translated from his obscure see Sasima(not Nazianzum as ~
39 23| being ~taken" to another see. And this was the practice
40 23| translations to the first ~see of the Church."(1)~ ~But
41 23| second when a ~bishop, whose see has been laid low by the
42 23| transferred to ~another see which is vacant, metabasis ;
43 23| either having or lacking a see, seizes on a bishopric ~
44 23| especially when it was ~the See of Constantinople that was
45 23| appoint to the Primatial See of Canterbury a bishop already ~
46 26| a full account of which see Morinus De SS. Ordinat.
47 26| observes.~ ~From this canon we see that the Nicene, fathers
48 29| adopt this practice; for we see in ~the Acts of the Apostles(
49 30| et seqq.[2ded.])~Let us see first what is the testimony
50 30| closer consideration ~we see, as Hardouin has proved,
51 31| over them, the lord of the see of the Divine Peter at Rome, ~
52 31| Alexandria, which is the see of Mark. And the third is
53 31| of ~Ephesus, which is the see of John the Divine who speaks
54 31| Antioch, which is another ~see of Peter. And let all the
55 32| affirms this(c. 10). We see that the Greek ~Church wishes
56 34| more desirable, ~than to see this festival, through which
|