Document

 1 3 |     several passages in the Oxford translation of ~Athanasius (pp. 51 sq.,
 2 6 |           be confessed that such a translation does violence to the text.
 3 9 |     followed this vacation, as his translation of ~the canon shows. It
 4 11|    Councils, Vol. I., p. 397.)~The translation of this [VI.] canon by Rufinus
 5 22|            ordained.~ ~HEFELE.~The translation of a bishop, priest, or
 6 22|            would be opposed to any translation or change. In 341 the ~Synod
 7 23|                    EXCURSUS ON THE TRANSLATION OF BISHOPS.~ ~There are
 8 23|         rather which forbade, ~the translation of a bishop from the see
 9 23|          Besides this objection to translation, St. Athanasius mentions
10 23|              apparently forbidding translation under any circumstances,
11 23|            did allow and approve a translation.(2) ~The general feeling,
12 23|        Cappadocia to Jerusalem, a ~translation made, so it is narrated,
13 23|         from selfish motives) not "translation"(wherein the will of God
14 23|        give his approbation to the translation of a ~bishop, this can,
15 23|             which only demands for translation the authority of the ~Metropolitan
16 23|             But, soon ~after this, translation became the rule, and not
17 24|   circumstances, and therefore the translation of this canon sent by ~the
18 26|       touch," is contrary to this ~translation, it seems by no means to
19 27| deaconesses" is most ~difficult of translation. I give the original, ~'
20 27|   exetasqeispn , ~ epei . Hefele's translation ~seems to me impossible,
21 30|          had had Father Romanus's ~translation revised before it was first
22 30|            issued an entirely ~new translation with a Proemium(1) containing
23 30|    eighty-four canons in his Latin translation of 1645, and was of opinion ~
24 30|         which ~he inserted a Latin translation of the Nicene canons. Rufinus
25 30|           canons into Latin. Their translation has been ~preserved to us