Document

 1 2 | Orthodox.~ ~Vasquez treats this matter at some length in his Disputations, (
 2 9 |          bishop. And, that this matter may have due investigation,
 3 11| thinking Rufinus in error. As a matter of fact the point ~is a
 4 11|  primacy ~(primatum)," and as a matter of fact the early date of
 5 12|        the action of Nice. The ~matter was not decided for a century
 6 16|     Ancyra, Canon V. where ~the matter is treated at some length.~ ~
 7 18|         But those who take [the matter] with indifference, and
 8 20|    proof of how ~important this matter was deemed could be found
 9 20|      Those who wish to read the matter treated of more at length,
10 23|       circumstances, yet, as a ~matter of fact, that very council
11 23|      This course, of having the matter decided by the synod, was
12 23|        Chr. Antiq.) sums up the matter ~tersely in the statement
13 23|        Thomassinus ~sums up the matter, "At the least we are forced
14 25|         read the history of the matter in all its details are referred
15 25|      the Patristic view of ~the matter, I give a list of the passages
16 28|     been baptized." ~This whole matter is treated clearly by St.
17 28|    Morinus, who has treated the matter most ~admirably.(De Ordinationibus,
18 31|     turns her out of doors, the matter must be diligently examined;
19 32|       bishop free to decide the matter; but in ~reference to priests,
20 33|      peace, there remained the ~matter of the insolence of Meletius
21 34|      that in such an ~important matter, and on a subject of such