Document

 1 2 |       points out how well the distinction is drawn by Epiphanius between ~
 2 2 |     substance as allows of no distinction: wherefore the Sabellians
 3 2 |      and substance but with a distinction between persons one from ~
 4 3 |     insists repeatedly on the distinction ~between ktixein and gennan , ~
 5 3 |   usage of the two forms. The distinction between the two ~terms,
 6 3 |       to dusgenwn . Here the ~distinction of meaning is strictly preserved,
 7 3 |    reason to suppose that the distinction ~was ever lost, though in
 8 3 |     once ~to show how far the distinction was appreciated, and to
 9 3 |      writing, however, is the distinction more ~obvious than in the
10 3 |    Homilies, x. 10 (where the distinction ~is employed to support
11 3 |        not indifferent to the distinction of meaning between the two
12 3 |      not ~ gnhtos . And this ~distinction is staunchly maintained
13 6 | already in orders(without any distinction between ~those who have
14 15|      and is used without ~any distinction from keirizein , whilst
15 15|    the Meletians, there is ~a distinction between these two words,
16 21|   expulsion ~gave rise to the distinction between the "Mass of the ~
17 25|   Calvin! He made the ~modern distinction between "interest" and "
18 25|    upon the truth of Calvin's distinction! Among Roman Catholics the ~