Document

 1 3| gennhtos between agenhtos and ~ agennhtos ; so that genhtos , ~ agenhtos
 2 3|        that only ~the Father is agennhtos , and only the Son ~ gennhtos ].~ ~
 3 3| Ignatius wrote ~ gennh?os kai ~ agennhtos , though his editors frequently
 4 3|        it into ~ gennh?os kai ~ agennhtos . For (1) the Greek MS.
 5 3|      have read ~ gennhtos kai ~ agennhtos , for there would be no
 6 3|         monos alhqinos ~ Qeos o agennhtos ~. . . tou de ~ monogonous
 7 3|     instance he ~takes the word agennhtos which like homousios is ~
 8 3|      the Son cannot be called ~ agennhtos , in the latter he may be
 9 3|         who read gennhtos ~ kai agennhtos in Ignatius, there is ~absolutely
10 3|     there was any ~such word as agennhtos so early as the time of ~
11 3|        denies the creation, and agennhtos the generation or ~parentage.
12 3|    Sibyll. ~prooem. 7, 17); and agennhtos in Soph. Trach. 61 ~(where
13 3|       no liking for the terms ~ agennhtos and gennhtos as applied ~