Document

 1 3 |        little doubt however, that Ignatius wrote ~ gennh?os kai ~ agennhtos ,
 2 3 |           this was after all what Ignatius meant by the double v, and
 3 3 |       than any previous editor of Ignatius, in his former work (Ign. ~
 4 3 |         his subsequent edition of Ignatius (p. ~338) he declares himself
 5 3 |         he quotes the ~passage in Ignatius as an example; of the former
 6 3 |       some ~writers subsequent to Ignatius declare en ~ to agennhton
 7 3 |       gennhtos ~ kai agennhtos in Ignatius, there is ~absolutely no
 8 3 |          so early as the time of ~Ignatius." In this he is certainly
 9 3 | convertibly. Whenever, as here in Ignatius, we have the double v ~where
10 9 |         in the dache, (c. 14), in Ignatius, and above all, in Justin ~(
11 26|    doctrine of the Eucharist. St. Ignatius more than a century and