Document

 1 10| misrepresented them, would his version have waited till the ~seventeenth
 2 11|       certain: the early Latin version of the canons, ~called the
 3 13|        as does also the Prisca version, according to which the
 4 13|      is merely an interpolated version of Conc. Hispal. II. A.D.
 5 18|       Prisca and the Isidorian version stands as ~part of canon
 6 24|      of the canon; for in this version no mention is made of ~any
 7 24|       Decretum, in Dionysius's version. Dist. xlvii, c. ii, and
 8 24|        and again in ~Isidore's version in Pars II, Causa xiv. Quaes.
 9 26|  before the bishop. The vulgar version of Isidore reads for "touched" ~"
10 30|      the seventh in the Latin ~version). What explains the error