Document
1 Intro| introduction of the words "and the Son."~ ~*Historical Note on
2 2 | Christ, ~ ~the only begotten Son of God, begotten of his
3 2 | with the Father and the Son together is ~ ~worshipped
4 2 | Christ, ~ ~the only begotten Son of God, begotten of the
5 2 | with the Father and the Son ~ ~together is worshipped
6 2 | there was a time when ~ ~the Son of God was not, and before
7 2 | one Lord Jesus Christ the Son of God, ~ ~begotten of God
8 2 | Father, receiving of the Son ~ ~( ek tou Patros ~ ~
9 2 | there was a time when the Son was not, or when ~ ~the
10 2 | and ~ ~affirm that the Son of God and the Holy Spirit
11 3 | CREED OF THE WORDS "AND THE SON."~ ~ ~ ~The introduction
12 3 | Creed of the words "and the Son" ~ ~(Filioque) has given
13 3 | the ~ ~expression "and the Son" was first used. For a temperate
14 3 | Spirit proceeds from the Son] having the consent of very
15 3 | they ~ ~wish to exclude the Son; but because it seemed to
16 3 | from the Father and ~ ~the Son, as from two principles
17 3 | from the Father ~ ~and the Son. But the Latins affirm that
18 3 | from the Father and the Son to deprive the ~ ~Father
19 3 | entire Godhead, viz. of the Son and of the, Holy Ghost;
20 3 | the Holy Ghost from the Son, the Son derives ~ ~from
21 3 | Ghost from the Son, the Son derives ~ ~from the Father;
22 3 | the words "and from the ~ ~Son." Now the fathers at Toledo
23 7 | course between calling the Son Consubstantial and calling
24 7 | reverential language about the Son than had been used by the
25 7 | had ~ ~spoken both of the Son and the Holy Spirit as creatures.
26 7 | uncreated majesty of the Son, even if they ~ ~retained
27 7 | their blasphemy against the Son of God, yet ~ ~called the
28 7 | with the Father and the Son as an object ~ ~of belief (
29 7 | from the Father (as the Son from the ~ ~Divine substance)
30 7 | with the Father and the Son ~ ~worshipped and glorified"
31 7 | misunderstood, that ~ ~the incarnate Son had no human intellect or
32 7 | uncreatedness of the Son, while they further rejected
33 7 | was the "Anomoion." The Son, they said, was not "like ~ ~
34 7 | all misunderstanding: the Son might be called ~ ~"God,"
35 8 | Caesarea, which described the Son as "like to the Father,"
36 9 | century: they regarded the Son and the Holy ~ ~Spirit as
37 9 | towards the Father, the ~ ~Son, and the Holy Spirit" (Euseb.,
38 10 | who thus ~ ~became God's Son. But this expansion of the
39 10 | existing and personal Son, although not verbally explicit
40 15 | the Father, and of ~ ~the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.~ ~ ~ ~
41 15 | recognizes the Father, the Son, and the ~ ~Holy Spirit
42 15 | Godhead of the Father, the Son, and the Holy ~ ~Ghost;
43 15 | Godhead of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost."~
44 17 | the identity of Father and Son, and do sundry ~ ~other
45 19 | of the Father, of ~ ~the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.
46 19 | of the Father and of the Son and of the ~ ~Holy Ghost;
|