Document

 1 Intro|      Historical Note on the lost Tome of this council.~ ~*Synodal
 2 4    |     HISTORICAL NOTE ON THE LOST "TOME" OF THE SECOND COUNCIL.~ ~ ~ ~
 3 4    |             Council set forth a "Tome," containing a statement
 4 4    |   Tillemont,(3) that ~ ~the lost Tome treated also of the Apollinarian
 5 4    |        summary at the end of the Tome, and was followed by the
 6 4    |        quite, verbatim from this Tome. It seems perfectly ~ ~evident
 7 4    |         at least one copy of the Tome was sent to the West but
 8 15   |                 IN regard to the tome of the Western [Bishops],
 9 15   |    EPITOME OF CANON V.~ ~ ~ ~The Tome of the Westerns which recognizes
10 15   |            With ~ ~regard to the tome of the Westerns, we agree
11 15   |          is certain that by the "Tome of the Westerns" a dogmatic
12 15   |       the only question is which Tome ~ ~of the Westerns is here
13 15   |   undoubtedly indicates that the Tome of the Westerns also ~ ~
14 15   |       him in 369, addressed ~ ~a Tome to the Orientals, of which
15 15   |      accepted and ~ ~signed this Tome, and at the same time sought
16 15   | referring the expression "the ~ ~tome of the Westerns" either
17 15   |        two documents, the one a "tome" ~ ~of an Antiochian Synod,
18 15   |          Synod, and the other a "tome" of the Ecumenical Council ~ ~
19 15   |        consequence, believe the "tome" there ~ ~produced to be
20 15   |        none other than the Roman Tome of 369, which was then ~ ~
21 15   |   Antioch sent a copy of this ~ ~Tome, with the declaration of
22 15   |         382 might well call this Tome, sent ~ ~back to Rome with
23 15   |   signatures of the Easterns, a "Tome ~ ~established at Antioch,"
24 15   |         Letter ~ ~speaks of this Tome, we are justified in supposing
25 15   |       still remains of the Roman Tome of 369, treats expressly ~ ~
26 15   |         were the contents of the Tome according to this canon.~ ~(
27 15   |          still preserved of this Tome contain ~ ~no passage directly
28 15   |          Synod that accepted the Tome ~ ~which urged the putting
29 15   |       they refer to the ~ ~Roman Tome of 369; and if the Westerns
30 15   |           in 381 pointed to this Tome, it was natural that the
31 15   |         as we suppose, in the ~ ~Tome of 369) spoken to the effect
32 19   |       you will deign to read the tome of the synod ~ ~of Antioch,
33 19   |        of Antioch, and also that tome issued last year by the