Document

 1 2 |       nor did ~ ~he convert his divine nature into the nature of
 2 3 |          The doctrine of ~ ~the Divine Monarchy was always intended
 3 7 |          as the Son from the ~ ~Divine substance) and very God, "
 4 7 |  consubstantiality of the Three Divine Persons (Theodoret, H. E.,
 5 7 |         place of the latter the divine Logos. In ~ ~opposition
 6 7 |       human flesh, that all the divine attributes were transferred
 7 7 |         human attributes to the divine, and the two ~ ~merged in
 8 7 |      whom, as it were, one part divine and two parts ~ ~human were
 9 7 |       which likewise put the ~ ~divine Logos in the place of rite
10 7 |             nous ) but that the divine personality took its place,
11 7 | essential mysteriousness of the Divine nature (Soc., ~ ~H. E.,
12 10|         a true ~ ~belief in the Divine Sonship and the Incarnation.
13 10|         Logos was an impersonal Divine power, immanent from ~ ~
14 10|       expansion of the original divine unity would ~ ~be followed
15 19|            you are gathering by divine permission at Rome, to the