Document
1 Intro| and Notes.~ ~*Excursus to Canon I., on the condemned heresies.~ ~*
2 2 | found in the ~ ~notes on Canon I. of this Council. One
3 4 | anathemas which ~ ~now form our Canon I. It also is likely that
4 5 | very least, the ~ ~seventh canon cannot have emanated from
5 5 | treating specially of this canon further on, ~ ~we shall
6 7 | CANON I.~ ~ ~ ~THE Faith of the
7 7 | ANCIENT EPITOME OF CANON I.~ ~Let the Nicene faith
8 7 | the Eudoxians, whom this canon identifies with the Arians [
9 7 | original ~ ~Arianism. But this canon makes the Semi-Arians identical
10 7 | THE HERESIES CONDEMNED IN CANON I.~ ~ ~ ~In treating of
11 7 | invert the order of the canon, and ~ ~shall speak of the
12 7 | From the foregoing by Canon Bright, the reader will
13 7 | Bright, Notes on the Canons, Canon I. of I. Const.)~ ~"The
14 12 | CANON II.~ ~ ~ ~THE bishops are
15 12 | invited. And the aforesaid ~ ~canon concerning dioceses being
16 12 | ANCIENT EPITOME OF CANON II.~ ~No traveller shall
17 12 | Constantinople made this canon.~ ~ ~ ~BALSAMON.~ ~Take
18 12 | notice from the present canon that formerly all the Metropolitans ~ ~
19 12 | all this was changed by Canon xxviij ~ ~of the Synod of
20 12 | are ~ ~mentioned in this Canon should be ordained by the
21 12 | law of the same synod ~ ~(Canon viii.), and by the Sixth
22 12 | Sixth Synod in its xxxixth Canon, the judgment ~ ~of the
23 12 | Eccl. in loc.).~ ~This Canon, which gives to the councils
24 13 | CANON III.~ ~ ~ ~THE Bishop of
25 13 | ANCIENT EPITOME OF CANON III.~ ~ ~ ~The bishop of
26 13 | change effected by this canon did not ~ ~affect Rome directly
27 13 | acknowledge the authority of this canon, he was in ~ ~reality defending
28 13 | principle laid down in the canon of Nice, that in ~ ~such
29 13 | refer to the wording of the canon which is ~ ~carefully guarded;
30 13 | consideration of the XXVIII canon of Chalcedon, ~ ~urging
31 13 | title three, understands the canon otherwise. For, it says, "
32 13 | nor ~ ~good. Moreover in Canon xxxvj of the Council in
33 13 | established in the sixth Nicene ~ ~canon, we must first take into
34 13 | in 341, in its ninth canon, had plainly declared this,
35 13 | Council, in its seventeenth canon, spoke in the same ~ ~sense.
36 13 | even Gratian adopted this canon in his collection the ~ ~
37 13 | added the following note: Canon hic ex iis est, quos ~ ~
38 13 | was made to this third Canon, the Pope St. Leo declared
39 13 | the ~ ~genuineness of this Canon! As already mentioned it
40 13 | GRATIAN'S "DECRETUM."~ ~This canon is of the number of those
41 13 | privileg.).(2)~ ~ ~ ~This canon Dionysius Exiguus appends
42 13 | Dionysius Exiguus appends to Canon 2, and dropping 5, 6, and ~ ~
43 14 | CANON IV.~ ~ ~ ~CONCERNING Maximus
44 14 | ANCIENT EPITOME OF CANON IV.~ ~ ~ ~Let Maximus the
45 15 | CANON V.~ ~(Probably adopted at
46 15 | ANCIENT EPITOME OF CANON V.~ ~ ~ ~The Tome of the
47 15 | Van Espen translate this canon differently, thus, "With ~ ~
48 15 | doctrines.~ ~ ~ ~HEFELE.~ ~This canon probably does not belong
49 15 | it seems to me that~this canon undoubtedly indicates that
50 15 | been already observed, this canon belongs to the Synod held ~ ~
51 15 | later Synod.~ ~(3.) The canon in question, as proceeding
52 15 | one ~ ~mentioned in its canon is the same.~ ~(9.) That
53 15 | the Tome according to this canon.~ ~(10.) It is true that
54 15 | full understanding of this canon, it is necessary to ~ ~observe
55 15 | 381, the Easterns in this canon ~ ~say, "We also recognise
56 16 | CANON VI.~ ~(Probably adopted
57 16 | ANCIENT EPlTOME OF CANON VI.~ ~ ~ ~Even one that
58 16 | used absolutely as in this canon. He ~ ~says, "When a merely '
59 16 | it, as in Chalcedon, Canon xxvj." He also points out
60 16 | also points out that in Canon ij., ~ ~and in Eusebius (
61 16 | from the context of this canon that "Diocese" here does ~ ~
62 16 | sufficient, ~ ~then the Canon orders the bishops of the
63 16 | VAN ESPEN.~ ~Both the Canon and the Civil Law require
64 16 | of bishops at which this canon was ~ ~enacted, this is
65 16 | WARNING TO THE READER TOUCHING CANON VII.~ ~ ~ ~(Beveridge, Synodicon,
66 16 | Tom. II., in loc.)~ ~This canon, I confess, is contained
67 16 | whole composition of this ~ ~canon clearly indicates that it
68 16 | in conjecturing that the canon was only an extract from
69 16 | than the latter. This canon, with an addition, was afterwards
70 17 | CANON VII.~ ~ ~ ~THOSE who from
71 17 | ANCIENT EPITOME OF CANON VII.(note 1 - this can brokedn
72 17 | ANCIENT EPITOME OF CANON VIII.~ ~ ~ ~Eunomians baptized
73 17 | Cathari," see Notes on Canon viii. of I. Nice.~ ~ ~ ~
74 17 | equally clear that this canon could not ~ ~have been framed
75 17 | heresies mentioned in this canon have been treated of in
76 17 | of in the ~ ~excursus to Canon j.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
77 18 | the creed, yet its third canon, respecting the rank of
78 18 | and confirmed the third canon of ~ ~Constantinople, the
79 18 | bishops (i.e. the third canon of Constantinople) was never ~ ~
80 18 | validity of the third ~ ~canon of Constantinople. Bishop
81 18 | Chalcedon itself, that the third canon had ~ ~been sanctioned by
|