Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library

Council of Constantinople I

IntraText CT - Text

  • CANON II.
Previous - Next

Click here to show the links to concordance

CANON II.
 
 
 
THE bishops are not to go beyond their dioceses to churches lying 
 
outside of their bounds, nor bring confusion on the churches; but let 
 
the Bishop of Alexandria, according to the canons, alone administer the 
 
affairs of Egypt; and let the bishops of the East manage the East alone, 
 
the privileges of the Church in Antioch, which are mentioned in the 
 
canons of Nice, being preserved; and let the bishops of the Asian 
 
Diocese administer the Asian affairs only; and the Pontic bishops only 
 
Pontic matters; and the Thracian bishops only Thracian affairs. And let 
 
not bishops go beyond their dioceses for ordination or any other 
 
ecclesiastical ministrations, unless they be invited. And the aforesaid 
 
canon concerning dioceses being observed, it is evident that the
synod of every province will administer the affairs of that particular 
 
province as was decreed at Nice. But the Churches of God in heathen 
 
nations must be governed according to the custom which has prevailed 
 
from the times of the Fathers.
 
 
 
NOTES.
 
 
 
ANCIENT EPITOME OF CANON II.
 
No traveller shall introduce confusion into the Churches either by 
 
ordaining or by enthroning. Nevertheless in Churches which are among the 
 
heathen the tradition of the Fathers shall be preserved.
 
 
 
In the above Ancient Epitome it will be noticed that not only is 
 
ordination mentioned but also the "inthronization" of bishops. Few 
 
ceremonies are of greater antiquity in the Christian Church than the 
 
solemn placing of the newly chosen bishop in the episcopal chair of his 
 
diocese. It is mentioned in the Apostolical Constitutions, and in the 
 
Greek Pontificals. Also in the Arabic version of the Nicene Canons. (No. 
 
lxxi.). A sermon was usually delivered by the newly consecrated bishop, 
 
called the "sermo enthronisticus." He also sent to neighbouring bishops 
 
    sullabai        enqronistikai   , and the fees the 
 
new bishops paid were called     ta    
 
    enqronistika   .
 
 
 
 
 
VALESIUS.
 
(Note on Socrates, H.E.v., 8).
 
This rule seems to have been made chiefly on account of Meletius. Bishop 
 
of Antioch, Gregory Nazianzen, and Peter of Alexandria. For Meletius 
 
leaving the Eastern diocese had come to Constantinople to ordain Gregory 
 
bishop there. And Gregory having abandoned the bishoprick of Sasima, 
 
which was in the Pontic diocese, had removed to Constantinople. While 
 
Peter of Alexandria had sent to Constantinople seven Egyptian bishops to 
 
ordain Maximus the Cynic. For the purpose therefore of repressing these 
 
[disorders], the fathers of the Synod of Constantinople made this canon.
 
 
 
BALSAMON.
 
Take notice from the present canon that formerly all the Metropolitans 
 
of provinces were themselves the heads of their own provinces, and were 
 
ordained by their own synods. But all this was changed by Canon xxviij 
 
of the Synod of Chalcedon, which directs that the Metropolitans of the 
 
dioceses of Pontus, Asia, and Thrace, and certain others which are 
 
mentioned in this Canon should be ordained by the Patriarch of 
 
Constantinople and should be subject to him. But if you find other 
 
churches which are autocephalous as the Church of Bulgaria, of Cyprus, 
 
of Iberia, you need not be astonished. For the Emperor Justinian gave 
 
this honour to the Archbishop of Bulgaria. ... The third Synod gave this 
 
honour to the Archbishop of Cyprus, and by the law of the same synod 
 
(Canon viii.), and by the Sixth Synod in its xxxixth Canon, the judgment 
 
of the Synod of Antioch is annulled and this honour granted to the 
 
bishop of Iberia.
 
 
 
TILLEMONT.
 
Mem. ix., 489).
 
The Council seems likewise to reject, whether designedly or 
 
inadvertently, what had been ordained by the Council of Sardica in 
 
favour of Rome. But as assuredly it did not affect to prevent either 
 
Ecumenical Councils, or even general Councils of the East, from judging 
 
of matters brought before them, so I do not know if one may conclude 
 
absolutely that they intended to forbid appeals to Rome. It regulates 
 
proceedings between Dioceses, but not what might concern superior 
 
tribunals.
 
 
 
FLEURY.
 
(Hist. Eccl. in loc.).
 
This Canon, which gives to the councils of particular places full 
 
authority in Ecclesiastical matters, seems to take away the power of 
 
appealing to the Pope granted by the Council of Sardica, and to restore 
 
the ancient right.
 
 
 
HEFELE.
 
An exception to the rule against interference in other patriarchates was 
 
made with regard to those Churches newly rounded amongst barbarous 
 
nations (not belonging to the Roman Empire), as these were of course  
 
obliged to receive their first bishops from  strange patriarchates, and 
 
remained after wards too few in number to form patriarchates of their 
 
own and were therefore governed as belonging to other patriarchates, as, 
 
for instance, Abyssinia by the patriarchate of Alexandria.



Previous - Next

Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library

Best viewed with any browser at 800x600 or 768x1024 on Tablet PC
IntraText® (V89) - Some rights reserved by EuloTech SRL - 1996-2007. Content in this page is licensed under a Creative Commons License