Document,  Chapter

 1  1  |      known; how he divided into two the person of Christ. Pope
 2  1  |       and his own; he sends him two letters from him self to
 3  1  |   Council; secondly, that these two things would rest with the
 4  3,1|         person, but because the two natures being brought together
 5  3,1|         Word himself, not as if two sons were sitting with him,
 6  3,1|        the error of speaking of two sons, for it will be necessary
 7  3,1|      one Lord Jesus Christ into two Sons. Neither will it at
 8  3,3|       into parts, as though the two natures were mutually united
 9  3,3|         been one, and], yet the two are not one. Neither do
10  3,3|   Christ, lest we openly cut in two the one Christ, the Son
11  3,3|       divides again Christ into two, and puts the man separately
12  3,3|        we do not divide between two hypostases or persons. For
13  3,3|       of as double, although of two (ek duo) and they diverse,
14  3,4|       impiety For it sets forth two facts. The one that the
15  3,4|        the word Theotocos under two heads;(1) Its history(2)
16  3,4|      the same properties of the two natures in Christ, not in
17  3,4|    connection (sunafeia) of the two natures, that of the Logos
18  3,4|     maintained the existence of two natures in Christ, but of
19  3,4|       natures in Christ, but of two persons, as, he says himself,
20  3,4| repeatedly says expressly: "The two natures united together
21  3,4|     suppose a true union of the two natures in Christ, but that
22  3,4|      external connection of the two. The expression sunafeia,
23  3,4|         they remain essentially two Persons. ~IV. ~IF anyone
24  3,4|     anyone shall divide between two persons or subsistences
25  3,4|     letters, which refer to the two natures of Christ, to one
26  3,4|         is not one and another (two persons) disjunctively and
27  3,4|    there was no one made of the two. But he held that our Lord
28  3,4|       doubt thought that he was two. ~Thedoret in his criticism
29  3,4|       that in Christ there were two distinct entities (re ipsa
30  3,4|       ipsa duos) that is to say two persons joined together;
31  3,4|      taught that there was, not two, but one of two natures,
32  3,4|        was, not two, but one of two natures, that is one person
33  3,4|    Christ, they are thinking of two sons; the one truly working
34  3,4|     with him as God, and yet as two different things, the one
35  3,4|   person should be divided into two adorable Sons and Christs,
36  4  |         unreasonably hinking of two sons, this anathematism
37  4  |    saying that "In the mouth of two or three witnesses every
38  5  |   promise of the Gospel; "Where two or three are gathered together
39  5  |    action. ~[In the Acts follow two short letters from Coelestine,
40  6  |               THE CANONS OF THE TWO HUNDRED HOLY AND BLESSED
41  6  |       side there were more than two hundred. ~John then proposed
42  6  |       the foregoing epistle and two others: but it is altogether
43  6,1|      regions, being in all over two hundred bishops. Then, in
44  6,1|      who were with him, to wit, two Metropolitans, the one Alexander
45  6,1|        say, "I do not confess a two or three months old God,"
46  6,1|         church, being more than two hundred bishops, and by
47  6,1|       second, and third call on two days, we summoned John and
48  6,1|        Epiphanius distinguishes two sorts of persons who were
49  6,1|   Councils, Vol. III., p. 77.) ~Two Thracian bishops, Euprepius
50  6,1|    previous practice of holding two bishoprics at the same time.