Document,  Chapter

 1  3,1|      person, but because the two natures being brought together in
 2  3,1|        for the difference of the natures is not taken away by the
 3  3,3|         parts, as though the two natures were mutually united in
 4  3,3|  equality of honour which unites natures; for then Peter and John,
 5  3,4|       any change or confusion of natures. ~St. Cyril explains that
 6  3,4|       same properties of the two natures in Christ, not in abstracto (
 7  3,4| connection (sunafeia) of the two natures, that of the Logos and of
 8  3,4|  maintained the existence of two natures in Christ, but of two persons,
 9  3,4|         says expressly: "The two natures united together make only
10  3,4|               If we consider the natures in their distinction, we
11  3,4|          a true union of the two natures in Christ, but that his
12  3,4|           which refer to the two natures of Christ, to one only of
13  3,4|     Christ, to one only of those natures, and even ascribes suffering
14  3,4|      virtue of the true unity of natures, and is not one and another (
15  3,4|          not two, but one of two natures, that is one person or suppositum,
16  4  |   distinguish the dignity of the natures; let him be anathema. ~ST.