Document, Chapter
1 1 | regard to the Council of Chalcedon. The literature upon the
2 1 | treated in the Council of Chalcedon, that is, the establishing
3 1 | letter, synodically made at Chalcedon, and placed among the acts. ~(
4 1 | and with the Fathers of Chalcedon. The forma is set forth
5 2 | ecumenical Synod assembled at Chalcedon, etc., etc. ;" The first
6 3 | emperors assembled together at Chalcedon the city of Bithynia, in
7 5 | FAITH OF THE COUNCIL OF CHALCEDON.~(Labbe and Cossart, Concilia,
8 5 | Valentinan, Augusti, at Chalcedon, the metropolis of the Bithynian
9 5 | contemporary of the Council of Chalcedon, of whose disciples several
10 5 | respecting the decree of Chalcedon concerning the faith, and
11 5 | offence in the fathers of Chalcedon that they had declared:
12 5 | years after the Council of Chalcedon, Evagrius copied its decree
13 5 | reproached the Synod of Chalcedon with having put in duabus
14 5 | Synod, adduced the creed of Chalcedon with the words in duabus
15 5 | decree that the city of Chalcedon, in which the synod of the
16 6 | HOLY AND FOURTH SYNODS, OF CHALCEDON.~
17 6,1| holding of the Council of Chalcedon, in the Greek Church, the
18 6,1| lay before the Synod of Chalcedon. As, however, most of the
19 6,2| canon repeated this canon of Chalcedon against persons ordained
20 6,6| intimate that the synod of Chalcedon held ordinations of this
21 6,6| and even the Council of Chalcedon has not declared them to
22 6,6| martyry" of St. Euphenia at Chalcedon in which the Council actually
23 6,7| in the third session of Chalcedon: he says, "'Es<S235]rateusamen
24 6,8| learn that the synod of Chalcedon willed that all who were
25 6,0| and that, in the days of Chalcedon, meant in two dioceses. ~
26 6,0| read in the 3d session of Chalcedon, complains of his patriarch
27 6,1| view is the xiii. canon of Chalcedon. ~With regard to this much-vexed
28 6,2| of the fourth session of Chalcedon we have qeia grammata ("
29 6,2| the case to the Council of Chalcedon, and it was taken up in
30 6,2| emperor had announced that Chalcedon was to be a titular metropolis,
31 6,0| assembled in October at Chalcedon must have heard by that
32 6,8| complains that the Council of Chalcedon broke the decrees of the
33 6,9| meeting of the council of Chalcedon, and in 394, only thirteen
34 6,9| rejected the xxviijth canon of Chalcedon. It is certain that he rejected
35 6,9| the doctrinal decrees of Chalcedon to go on further and express
36 6,9| Constantinople and the XXVIIIth of Chalcedon, but as M. l'abbe Duchesne
37 6,9| exactly canon xxviij. of Chalcedon. Moreover the Seventh Ecumenical
38 6,9| I. Constantinople and of Chalcedon (which had been an hulled
39 6,0| all the genuine canons of Chalcedon, and in almost all ecclesiastical
40 6,0| twenty-eight genuine canons of Chalcedon from the fact that a later
41 6,0| ecclesiastical rule declared at Chalcedon, and in so far a kanwn,
42 6,1| history of the Council of Chalcedon. ~
43 6,2| Thus ended the Council of Chalcedon after it had lasted three
|